You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
12 points

Well… Mao is the one who wanted to reeducate the last emperor so I wouldn’t say that exactly portrays Mao.

permalink
report
parent
reply

…despite saying “communism is the weapon used to crush the enemy” and how it’s not really love, in contrast to che/castro?

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Communism is not love. It is a hammer we use to crush our balls. -Mao Zedong

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Engels came to me in my dreams and told me cbt was the only way to free the proletariat.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

I kinda see what you mean in that Mao is confrontational and that one of his innovations in dialectics is an emphasis on destruction in the resolution of contradictions (rather than just thinking of sublation almost as a form of incorporation, or perhaps of synthesis as primary/only way for dialectical contradictions to resolve).

But there are a lot of ways to defeat (or even ‘crush’) a collective enemy, including in violent conflict, far short of extermination! I don’t think Mao’s ideological combativeness or record as a military leader should (or can, really) be mistaken for the kind of raw bloodlust we can recognize in a call to ‘exterminate’.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Heraclitus speaks of war as that which creates birth, because to him it portrayed death and so it can be understood as the antithesis of life.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Ask Lemmygrad

!asklemmygrad@lemmygrad.ml

Create post

A place to ask questions of Lemmygrad’s best and brightest

Community stats

  • 387

    Monthly active users

  • 566

    Posts

  • 7.8K

    Comments