I have rebuilt Emacs 29 with PGTK in order to get Emacs running natively and to fix the fonts, and i already have another emacs 29 build (Lucid) installed with i use On X.
I was surprised to see Emacs on wayland was running slower than its counterpart on Xwayland. Also the fonts issue was not fixed.
While zooming in makes the fonts look better. On X i don’t have this issue.
Below is screenshots of fonts on Wayland - Xwayland and X

On wayland (PGTK)

Xwayland (Lucid)

Xorg (Lucid)

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context

As there seems to be quite a lot of hate for Wayland and PGTK I too can confess that all reasons of u/noi-gai are also my experiences for using Emacs on Linux. If there wouldn’t be Wayland scaling support with PGTK I wont use Emacs GUI any longer, as everyting would be blurry.

Now I do not know what I miss by not using X as I do not wander back and forth but stick to Wayland since years. Oh I do miss proper GTK integration, but this is only ever going to happen with multithreading-support.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Emacs

!emacs@communick.news

Create post

A community for the timeless and infinitely powerful editor. Want to see what Emacs is capable of?!

Get Emacs

  • Windows
  • Mac OS X
  • GNU/Linux and BSD (Just get it from your distribution’s package manager)

Rules

  1. Posts should be emacs related
  2. Be kind please
  3. Yes, we already know: Google results for “emacs” and “vi” link to each other. We good.

Emacs Resources

Emacs Tutorials

Useful Emacs configuration files and distributions

Quick pain-saver tip

Community stats

  • 18

    Monthly active users

  • 562

    Posts

  • 2.4K

    Comments