And no IPad version to

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
87 points

Yes it is, and because of who owns it, I would even prefer that to an unsandboxed closed source native binary.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

Pretty much I’ll never understand why people want their webpages to be apps with access to all your shit

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

It’s because the vast, vast, VAST majority of people have no idea that many apps are just showing a website. Also, the app version is almost always more efficient in terms of precious phone screen real estate compared to a browser. Apps also remember who you are so you don’t have to login. It isn’t hard to understand why people like them.

That said, many apps are horrible from a privacy perspective. But that is largely hidden from the average user, most of whom simply don’t think much about online privacy anyway.

I hope the ubiquity of irritating ads are the thin edge of the wedge that gets more people interested in ad-blocking, and then perhaps online privacy more generally.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

it is convenient mostly for developers, not people.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

But a lot of these apps are electron webpages in application form I’ll never understand it

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

linuxmemes

!linuxmemes@lemmy.world

Create post

I use Arch btw


Sister communities:
Community rules
  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

Community stats

  • 7.5K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.2K

    Posts

  • 68K

    Comments