SpaceX’s Starship rocket system reached several milestones in its second test flight before the rocket booster and spacecraft exploded over the Gulf of Mexico.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
207 points

I really wish they’d stop putting Musk’s name on things like this. He didn’t design the engines, he didn’t plan the flight path, he did nothing but throw a bunch of money at a company because he’s obsessed with Mars.

permalink
report
reply
117 points

He does force them to cut corners for the sake of more headlines though

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Which is why I’m nervous for when they decide to start doing manned flights.

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

Falcon 9 is the most reliable rocket in the world and it used to explode like this too. It’ll be 5-10 years of successful unmanned flights before anyone rides on this rocket.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

The US government has a pretty good track record on making sure astronauts don’t die.

permalink
report
parent
reply
42 points
*

Blame the poster. The CNN article itself doesn’t have Musk in the headline and barely mentions him at all (there is one quote near the end).

EDIT

Or maybe don’t blame the poster. From the URL and web archives, it appears CNN may have changed the title.

https://www.cnn.com/2023/11/18/world/elon-musk-spacex-starship-launch-scn/index.html

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

Perhaps it’s time for titles that match the article headlines as a matter of policy here?

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Actually, I just realized the poster may have used the original CNN title.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

That is already the rule. CNN changed the headline after I posted it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

… throw a bunch of money at a company because he ’s obsessed with Mars. wanted to justify sending money to some Russian arm dealers friends.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

what? didn’t he start SpaceX because Russia WOULDN’T take his money?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

IIRC, they wouldn’t take his money because he misunderstood the price they wanted, tried to bargain it down and lowball them, and ended up pissing them off so much they doubled the price.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

He tried to buy Russian decommissioned ICBMs but the DoJ wouldn’t let him.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

He did insist they slap an X on it tho. Thats gotta be worth something, right.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Sadly, Thats how capitalism work hence they keep using Musk’s name. Anyone with money is valuable in our economy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-43 points

This just false. Sure, he did not do everything alone but he has a huge hand in engineering concepts and design decisions. Lots of hate and complete misunderstanding how spaceship, spaceX and Musk work in this thread.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

When Elon still wrote code it was so bad they had to scrap most of it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

And the one they did use ended up into a fridge’s firmware.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

The dude prefers reviewing source code on paper.

Anyone who writes code knows that is not a practical way to review.

Maybe in his time he got book smart about some physics/rocket concepts. That’s the least I would expect anyway. But that doesn’t mean he really has any expertise to offer to the product.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

I agree it makes no sense. A fair number of my clients are morons and about 2 or 3 times a year they want a printout of the code.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-27 points

You’re wrong. Watch some videos on starship development and the history on spacex in general.

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 19K

    Posts

  • 496K

    Comments