You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
2 points
*

So then it would seem like SMTP is a pretty poor example of an open standard? Acknowledging that a technology will only work in practice if everyone adds their own unpublished rules around it is kind of admitting that the standard and protocol isn’t sufficient.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

You’re not wrong there. SMTP dates back to 1981, and at that time, there were zero security features, and it was designed to be used for plain text only. Every other feature of email has been glommed on to that core. HTTP, DNS, FTP, they all suffer from the same kind of thing - developed a very long time ago when security and identity were barely a thought.

I don’t know the details of how standards for ActivityPub is written, but being that it is much newer, I have to think that more thought has been put to modern needs. Of course, the modern landscape is completely different than it was in the early 1980s, so it’s yet to be seen how this will all develop. That said, these earlier protocols are examples of how a protocol can take hold and not be finally extinguished.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Shower Thoughts

!showerthoughts@kbin.social

Create post

A community for sharing those miniature epiphanies you have that highlight the oddities within the familiar.

Community stats

  • 1

    Monthly active users

  • 176

    Posts

  • 1K

    Comments

Community moderators