Archive link

This is an incredibly shit article trying to play reader’s emotions. I do not agree with the execution of ULEZ expansion.

But death threats? Defacing? What the actual fuck, people?

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
2 points

I agree and encourage you to reread what I wrote. Yes, the ulez both encourages less vehicles AND electric vehicles. That’s not the same thing but achieves a common purpose generally. I struggle to answer the issue that you can drive modern 4x4s and older vehicles still but I think they are necessary allowable technicality because one is often half-electric and cleaner than a vehicle ten years older, and the other is soo niche that the percentage it affects is irrelevant.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Statecraft

!statecraft@lemmy.cafe

Create post

  • URL has to point to the actual article
  • Body has to have an archive link

Community stats

  • 239

    Monthly active users

  • 88

    Posts

  • 197

    Comments

Community moderators