You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
27 points

Anarchy is not absence of rules, it’s absence of hierarchy. So you could still collectively agree to certain rules for merges.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Basicaly democracy on steroids

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

So we could use a blockchain… (/s)

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

But then one person disagree with those rules and we’re back to no rules

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

You can have a majority vote system.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Which is not a collective agreement and not anarchism, if it imposes rules on those who voted against.

permalink
report
parent
reply

linuxmemes

!linuxmemes@lemmy.world

Create post

I use Arch btw


Sister communities:
Community rules
  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

Community stats

  • 7.6K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.2K

    Posts

  • 68K

    Comments