You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
124 points
*

Car brains are out in force for this thread, lol.

Apparently, if you can’t transit products by car or truck, directly to the front-door of every business, the city will collapse.

permalink
report
reply
0 points
*

I worry more about emergency services access…

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Emergency services have a lot of problems delivering care in current city traffic.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Sure, but if they don’t have any roads to travel on what then?

But I’ve seen another comment mentioning the distinction between roads and streets so I guess that might explain why I can’t imagine how that would be realistic.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

These people also forget that “delivery trucks allowed” is common. Cutting out 95% of cars and leaving delivery vehicles is fine.

permalink
report
parent
reply
74 points

That there are cities that have actually done this doesn’t seem to stop them insisting it’s impossible.

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

Something I think is sort of ironic is that in my neighborhood most of the last mile delivery happens on bike. This isn’t because of a lack of automobile infrastructure but because there are too many automobiles. Nowhere to park or even idle the van for a short time.

I do also suspect it’s more convenient for the delivery person to hop off a bike at each stop than it would be to park a car and get out etc.

If I were a city planner I’d integrate that system into my strategy. Ripping out every road is of course hyperbole and clickbait, but ripping out every other road seems like a no brainer. But I seriously doubt converting 3/4 or more of the roads for autos into pedestrian/bike/tram/greenspace would shake things up too bad. Just make sure to keep main arteries open for automobiles and ensure there’s centralized parking garages (street parking is a blight) within a decent walking distance and I think people who need to have a car in the city will get used to it fast.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Hey so I come from a european city from 778, with most of the streets having been the same for over 500 years now.

Heineken truck drivers manage to supply bars and restaurants throughout the city with little to no problems and most of that is pedestrian zoning with exceptions for deliveries and it works quite well.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-23 points
*

Name five, with populations higher than 50,000.

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points
*

You know there are dozens of major cities that have converted major roads, and entire precincts, to foot traffic only… right?

Turns out it’s pretty easy to transport inventory in hand trolleys a few blocks as most major cities, especially business districts, are flat as fuck.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points

What is your proposed alternative solution for logistics in any moderately dense urban area? Like never mind New York, you couldn’t make this work in Little Rock.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Why don’t you read the article? It’s all spelled out right there.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-17 points

Oh, this lie?

Nearly a quarter (23 per cent) of car journeys were under two miles and 60 per cent under five miles. “You could really walk two miles. By the time you get in the car, parked it, you have arrived there in the same time,” said Dr Fuller.

Yeah that’s totally going to get people to charge their behavior and not piss them off.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-15 points

What? No it isn’t.

No part of the article discusses replacing the logistics function of cargo vehicles, but it does propose ripping out the road infrastructure they run on.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Currently, no. But with mixed zoning, it would become more amenable to change over time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-13 points

This is a fantasy. It can’t be implemented in large scale in any practical sense.

Centralization of distribution and centralization of production is always more efficient. You aren’t going to put dairy farms next to apartment buildings next to orchards next to paper manufacturing plants next to microchip fabricators next to restaurants next to family homes next to waste water treatment next to hospitals next to bookstores next to power generators next to garbage incinerators next to grocery stores…

These things get separated from each other for good reason, and running rail lines to all of them will never be practical. There will always be a need to fill the gap with small, independently powered vehicles for cargo transport.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

Fuck_cars on Lemmy is great, I feel like I’m really fighting for the future every time I come here.

On Reddit it was just people trying to out meme each other

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Fuck_cars on Lemmy is great, I feel like I’m really fighting for the future every time I come here.

Lol

permalink
report
parent
reply

Fuck Cars

!fuckcars@lemmy.world

Create post

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let’s explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be Civil

You may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speech

Don’t discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass people

Don’t follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don’t doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topic

This community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No reposts

Do not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

  • [meta] for discussions/suggestions about this community itself
  • [article] for news articles
  • [blog] for any blog-style content
  • [video] for video resources
  • [academic] for academic studies and sources
  • [discussion] for text post questions, rants, and/or discussions
  • [meme] for memes
  • [image] for any non-meme images
  • [misc] for anything that doesn’t fall cleanly into any of the other categories

Recommended communities:

Community stats

  • 5.6K

    Monthly active users

  • 869

    Posts

  • 24K

    Comments