1.1K

If purchasing isn’t owning, then piracy isn’t stealing(fosstodon.org)

posted
by
Avatar
maegul (he/they)@lemmy.ml
in
Avatar
piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
156 comments
hidereport

I am ashamed that I hadn’t reasoned this through given all the rubbish digital services have pulled with “purchases” being lies.

Sort:
HotTopControversialNewOld
You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
Avatar
merc@sh.itjust.works
7 points

Who cares? The point is, it’s not theft. The person who had the art still has the art, so it’s not theft.

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
floppade@lemm.ee
1 point

That is an assumption made that the artist still has the original thing that was not paid for. I understand what you’re being pedantic about. I just don’t think you’re right.

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
merc@sh.itjust.works
3 points

What part of that statement suggests that the artist no longer has the original art? As stated, no theft occurred.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

!piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Create post
⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don’t request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don’t request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don’t submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others

Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

💰 Please help cover server costs.
Ko-fi Liberapay

Community stats

  • 4.8K

    Monthly active users

  • 3.4K

    Posts

  • 87K

    Comments

Community moderators