You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
-20 points

Correct me of I’m wrong, but I’m pretty sure the president has the authority to send troops to engage an enemy for up to like 60 days before needing to have anything cleared by congress.

If this is how Republicans want to play, we could still still support Ukraine by intervening directly.

permalink
report
reply
36 points

Oh buddy, don’t wish for that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

What I wish for is that Putin trips over a dildo and suffers a spinal injury that triggers every single one of his pain receptors so that all he can experience from here on out is pure agony, effectively removing him from power and marking an end to his stupid fucking war.

…but short of that, I’ll settle for another option that marks an end to his stupid fucking war; and while we can hope for the former, we can actually accomplish the latter.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

The LAST thing we want is to be directly involved.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

The last thing we want to do is show Russia that the threat of escalation is their free pass to wipe other countries off the map. The best thing we can do in terms of impact on the US, is to arm Ukraine so that they’re capable of winning this stupid fucking war on their own; but republicans are blocking that, because they don’t give a fuck about human life.

I don’t see any good options on the table… so, what’s the least-bad option?

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Fuck that!

That really will escalate the war.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Oh dang, I forgot about escalation. Which country should we feed to Putin after he’s done destroying Ukraine? Gotta keep him appeased at all costs!

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

A nato one. Give them all the materiel they want, and arm them to the teeth, just not boots on ground.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

…you want dead or wounded American soldiers? Disgusting.

Edit: just to clarify, my point is that we’re all human, no matter the occupation. You shouldn’t think of sending troops like moving a chess piece. That’s someone’s family member.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Speaking as a vet - I understand the implication. I also understand the implication of just letting Russia decimate other countries without consequence. Families are being murdered on your chess board right now whether or not they fly our colors. Russia is currently in a severely weakened state, so a full military response from the US and hopefully our allies would end the war practically over night.

The best option is for Russia to pull out on its own - that’s not going to happen. The second best option is for Ukraine to defend itself in a manner effective enough to force Russia to withdraw - republicans are blocking that. The third best option is for the rest of the world to step in to swiftly end wars of aggression.

The worst thing we can do is show Russia that the threat of escalation is enough to give them a free pass to just wipe other countries off the map.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

I mean, if it’s between people who didn’t volunteer and people who did, I would have to say it should be the volunteers (US military)

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

This isn’t /r/NCD

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Now that is certainly a take

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 14K

    Posts

  • 413K

    Comments