lemm.ee

https://www.ukrinform.net/rubric-ato/3731486-russians-spreading-fake-news-about-ukraines-alleged-plans-to-attack-znpp-with-drones-intel.html

-1 points

1 year ago

The Russians are not making it easy for themselves, aren’t they?

report

[ - ]

☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml

-7 points

1 year ago

Ah yeah, that totally looks like a reliable site that somebody without any brain damage would use as a source.

report

[ - ]

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/liveblog/2023/7/5/russia-ukraine-live-news-kyiv-attacks-russian-forces-in-donestsk

0 points

1 year ago

I don’t need more evidence that your problem is with reading comprehension. This isn’t a news source per se, this tells what the Russian state media reports about. It doesn’t take much effort to corroborate that:

https://eurasiantimes.com/ukraine-suicide-drone-attacks-zaporizhzhia-nuclear-power/

Speaking about brain damage.

report

https://www.france24.com/en/tv-shows/the-interview/20230629-iaea-saw-no-evidence-moscow-planning-attack-on-zaporizhia-nuclear-plant-but-anything-can-happen

[ - ]

☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml

4 points

1 year ago

You haven’t collaborated anything, and the fact that you think that’s collaboration further underscores my point. How about we look at what IAEA, who actually have people on the ground, have to say

report

[ - ]

-2 points

1 year ago

I think you should take a break, walk outside for a bit, and hop back with a clearer mind. Your are arguing about… I don’t know what about.

Fact: Russian newspapers are announcing that an attack by Ukraine on the ZNPP is imminent. It doesn’t matter whether you trust Ukraine’s account of it, because this is literally in the Russian newspapers: https://www.rt.com/russia/579215-ukrainian-attack-nuclear-plant/

My question is: (what THIS thread is about) from the viewpoint of a Russian propagandist, how can they make this story seem credible, (or, IOW, what would Ukraine’s motive be) considering that this would hurt Ukraine the most.

Next time you can use less of your condescending tone and more of your reading time to post on point.

report

[ - ]

☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml

-2 points

1 year ago

I think you should take your own advice, also try working on your reading comprehension while you’re at it given that your link says Russia is worried that Ukraine would cause a provocation.

From a view point of a sane person who isn’t guzzling Ukrainian propaganda out of a firehouse, it’s pretty obvious that the Ukrainian offensive is a giant failure. Even western media now admits this. NATO summit is happening in a week, and Ukraine is desperate to get NATO involved directly in the conflict.

It’s also pretty clear that the puppet regime in Ukraine doesn’t care one bit about hurting their own country. If they did, they would’ve taken the peace agreement they were offered back in March.

report

[ - ]

1 point

1 year ago

Dude, I’ve been super polite, factual, and thorough with you. The context is, a thread started off a (light/teasing) comment of mine. All replies in it where on topic and on a similar light tone except yours. I showed. I explained. I re-explained to you why what you said (no matter whether I agreed or not) is off track, but you keep charging with partisan arguments.

By all means, keep going with your crusade, but you are just talking to yourself at this point and demonstrating that you are giving very little consideration to other’s opinions and messages. Your time would be better employed doing something else is what I think.

report