You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
13 points

We use messenger, which I also don’t like. Its ridiculous. If these fucken tech giants aren’t going to right interoperability standards then someone needs to force them to. We made all this shit to make life better and somehow have forgotten that was the fucken goal.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

For better or worse you happen to be using the one messaging app that is broadly agreed to be worse than iMessage.

Signal and Telegram are far superior, even putting aside the most glaring flaws of the other two.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Signal/Telegram are not very common where I’m at. I have Signal, nobody in my contacts does.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

I’ve successfully converted a spouse, which I don’t think is out of the question w.r.t who I replied to.

I’ve also converted my main friend group, but appreciate that’s insurmountable for a lot of people - genuinely, people hate change after all. I’m lucky to have a lot of friends who work in tech and are receptive to trying new things.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Its convenience. Why have both of us download a new app strictly for pictures when she is already on Facebook, and I have a dusty one with no posts for a decade. Plus getting someone in the US to download a 3rd party messaging app is like asking them to respond to the Nigerian Prince for his offers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Fair enough. It’s kind of an oxymoron to worry about the trust of a given 3rd party messaging app while using products from a known, wide scale, repeated privacy intruder like Meta, but you have what you need in terms of convenience so I won’t make a further case for an alternative.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I’d say Telegram isn’t superior. It’s default encryption is nowhere near iMessage.

And if you step up the encryption, you lose group chats.

For it’s flaws, iMessage is a very good solution, one that Signal was emulating for a while.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I’m not criticising the UX of iMessage for Apple to Apple comms. It’s solid, and was leader-in-class for a very long time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Why messenger of all things. That’s the worst one.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points
*

Why should they be forced to interop? That’ll just reduce it to the lowest commend denominator. What impetus would any of them have for investing in making a better system if everyone can use their work?

We have choices. We don’t have to use iMessage, or Beeper. We can use other messengers.

Forcing interop means all messengers will function the same… Again at the LCD level.

Plus different messengers have different capabilities, different use-cases.

Frankly I don’t even want to use SMS at all, and haven’t wanted to for 10 years. I want a messenger that’s independent of my mobile device that I can simply sign into just about anywhere. Kind of like instant messengers were in the late 90’s (which often used things like XMPP).

Ten+ years ago I was running instant messengers on Android. Pidgin, Trillian, etc, logging in to multiple messengers. That should’ve been the path forward, but people couldn’t be bothered because SMS was free, native, and “good enough” (in their minds).

And yet back then any conversations I had on any device showed up on all devices. With no dependence on my SIM or phone hardware ID.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

>“Interop bad”

>using lemmy

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

interoperability is the capability of a product or system to interact and function with others. Why would that force them to all function the same? Why would that be bad for us as consumers? Why does it matter how many choices we have if those choices restrict us to using a specific one? Interoperability solves all of these and causes none of the problems you are stating. Of course they have no incentive for doing this as it doesn’t benefit a corporation, they’re only incentivized to entrap people in their ecosystems cause it makes them the most money. Different messaging standards is one of the ways they keep us locked in. This is a choice, too, one made by the tech giants for you with no choice in the matter. You can’t send a nice quality picture from iMessage to Google Messages, get fukt.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points
*

How else do you make them interop, other than by finding a common mapping?

Why would any company map their extended or unique elements, which they developed, to meet government regs?

They won’t, they’ll drop to the least effort required to get the regulators off their backs.

I have a choice. Apple users have a choice. There are plenty of other messenging systems out there.

MS Teams

Skype

Element

SimpleX

Signal

Telegram

Wire

Wiremin

Litewire

Discord

Conversations

Snikket

Briar

Zello

TwinMe

Tox

Keybase

Threema

Whatsapp

Jami

XMPP (which some listed use)

Just go to Wikipedia for a long list of different messengers and their capabilities.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 18K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 553K

    Comments