Comment by DontMakeMoreBabies@kbin.social on YouTube is deliberately crippling Firefox on ARM systems

Fuck Google.

Searching a tracking number from Chrome using Google? Finds a package.

Same search on Google from Firefox leads to nothing.

Hell net neutrality laws might even have relevance if they keep this up.

Edit 2: Well, at least I know I’m right. Downvote away.

Sorry, I’m all for net neutrality, but behavior based on browser usage, while dickish, has nothing to do with it.

Edit: it seems like I’m being schooled. Got any sources to back up your downvotes?

Edit 3: nope. I’m not being schooled. The downvoters should either get better informed or stop downvoting with their emotions.

yes it does, net neutrality not only has to do with the ISP but also the services. different useragent string should NOT lead to a worse quality of service.

Got any source on that? I’m legitimately asking to learn more about that.

Right, but your service provider has nothing to do with that difference. The fact that the entity you’re contacting on the other end of the connection is providing a degraded experience isn’t an internet service delivery problem.

Your internet service, which is what net neutrality is concerned with, is distinct from services on the internet. In the same way that your phone service has nothing to do with the quality of service you get from HP’s telephone support line.

The web is based on open standards; that’s what made it universally accessible. How does limiting access based on how you access the web benefit anyone?

It doesn’t, but that isn’t their point. They’re simply pointing out that existing net neutrality laws in the US usually only apply to ISPs and telcos, not internet businesses.

Nobody is defending the practice, they’re just differentiating it from what we’ve previously referred to as “net neutrality,” which is 100% entirely about how ISPs process internet traffic, and not about the services being used within that traffic.

Unless I missed the memo, and “net neutrality” means something different now.

Imagine a business making some smoothies with water provided by the utility company. The business decides to sell less appetizing smoothies to certain organizations. Are you saying that that’s a “water utility neutrality” issue?

Where did I say it did? The fact that it’s not a net neutrality issue doesn’t mean it’s not an issue. Net neutrality is just a specific thing that isn’t this.

It doesn’t, that’s FTC / anticompetitive law territory

Hmmm, not sure why people are downvoting…

Maybe these days people are using the term “net neutrality” in a broader sense to just mean equitable access, rather than the specific meaning that’s been used in the past to refer to ISP behavior and giving preference based on how much is paid?

Well, you might want to look at the Wikipedia article on Net Neutrality to see whether or not you are being schooled on it.

In that case I’m right. Thanks. I thought my memory was pulling a fast one on me.

It also does that with other unrecognised user agents.

Personally I don’t understand why someone would still use Google when duckduckgo has more features and is just as good for searching and in the very rare case it isn’t you can easily switch back temporarily by just adding the prefix “!g” to your query.

I tried duckduckgo for a while and kept coming back to Google for “real” searches at work. It’s not as good for searching in my experience. Yet.

Duckduckgo has become a little better than it used to be… but google has also become a whole lot worse.

Yeah, I haven’t quite found a replacement that is better than google, but the way the trajectories are, it’s only a matter of time.

If you’re looking for research papers, duckduckgo (and yandex) is your friend - google is perfectly unusable for that these days.

This is the truth. I switched back when I got a new pc at work, and google was way worse.

The vast majority of times I go back to Google to do a search I find it also returns useless results. I’m not convinced it’s any better than duckduckgo. I think it used to be, but not anymore.

I had the same experience. I used switch between DDG and Google when DDG gave results I didn’t want. During the pandemic, I remember DDG giving lots of false positives and odd, non-standard web page hits. Like, if I was searching for current COVID advice, it would give me hits from the health department in Bumfuck, Nebraska instead of, say, CDC (and I don’t live in Bumfuck, Nebraska). It has really improved since then and now I can use DDG pretty much exclusively. Not having to scroll past a page of Google ads to find my search results is quite glorious.

The 6 residents of bumfuck Nebraska would like a word with you after their Trump circlejerk.

And I would be honored to speak with them!

I think it depends on wether google is eating the cookies or not

What’s your field?

I’m in a DevOps/Cloud Engineer role and DDG works better for me than Google. No ads and somehow fewer of the gpt generated fake help articles.

Same vein, devops/data engineering. Maybe I’ll give it another shot, I’d like to get off Google.

Big same. I’ll even bang out to Startpage to try to avoid directly using Google (!sp vs. !g), but that’s not as good either.

I bow to my search overlord Google. Until I try Grasp, Kagi, and SearXNG, and hopefully one of those will satisfy (in particular SearXNG).

Until then DDG remains my default, and I’ll !g half the time :(

Did you use Kagi? How was it?

Been using Kagi for a few months. Now that the unlimited tier is $10 it’s a no brainer, for me.

One of the three on my to-try list, still.

I tried it a few months ago and bought it before the trial was over. Took some time to build trust but it’s still on par with google if not better.

(My account probably looks like a shill for them but I swear I’m just a happy user)

I really want to ditch Google, but DuckDuckGo aint there my brother.

It may work for some simpler/lazy searches, but for real stuff, nah.

The “good” thing is that Google search is going the way of Amazon, so with Google shooting themselves in the foot and DDG catching up a bit, maybe soon they’ll level

Works perfectly fine for trouble shooting complicated IT problems.

ddg always drops one of at least two troublesome terms. Which is infuriating.

Might have to do with my settings, in which case it is a bug.

Bangs are gold (which is why ddg is my default) but i still sometimes miss exclusions.

I’ve switched most defualts over to DDG but Google is still better for some things. Feels sort of like the late 99s/early 00s with Altavista, Ask Jeeves, etc.

Isn’t ducksuckgo just paying for google search with a privacy wrapper/obfuscation layer on top?

Yes, except for it’s Bing search not Google

I think they also use Yahoo and their own scrapers too.

Not that it matters of course.

It’s stupid we need an extension to fix this on mobile devices but there’s an extension to fix this on mobile devices

I get results with DDG

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

YouTube is deliberately crippling Firefox on ARM systems(social.treehouse.systems)

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Our Rules

Approved Bots

Community stats

Community moderators