5 points
It “still exists” but user adoption is basically zero, which is the opposite goal of open standards.
2 points
*
User adoption here is also “basically zero.”
Lemmy is a rounding error in population versus larger sites. It’s a walled garden.
You cannot weaken the fediverse more than the near-total lack of adoption that already exists.
3 points
User adoption here is also “basically zero.”
Yes and there are a variety of reasons why it is that way, none of which includes being picked up by a megacorp for profit and then being dumped later after they’ve extracted all the value from it.
1 point
Assuming it is picked up and dropped, the fediverse is completely unchanged. That’s my point.
