1.“Federal agencies have the authority to intervene in protests, picket signs, or blockades. The law is impartial: it must be enforced without exception.”

2.“Federal forces are not required to have judicial oversight for their actions.”

3.“Forces are not obligated to consider alternative entrances or pathways. If the main path is blocked, their duty is to clear it.”

4.“This action continues until the flow of traffic is fully restored.”

5.“To carry out these acts, forces will use the minimum necessary force, which is sufficient and proportional to the situation they are addressing.”

6.“Instigators and organizers of the protest will be identified.”

7.“Vehicles used in the protest will be identified and subjected to citations or penalties.”

8.“Data of the instigators, accomplices, participants, and organizers will be transmitted to the authorities through appropriate channels.”

9.“Notices will be sent to the judge in cases of damage, such as burning flags.”

10.“In cases involving minors, relevant authorities will be notified, and the guardians of these youths who bring them to these demonstrations will face sanctions and punishment.”

11.“The costs incurred by security operations will be borne by the responsible organizations or individuals. In cases involving foreigners with provisional residency, information will be forwarded to the National Directorate of Immigration.”

12.“A registry will be created for organizations that participate in these types of actions.”

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
55 points

Nah, libertarianism and “anarcho”-capitalism are just both joke ideologies that nobody will take seriously for a reason.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Eh, let’s hold that particular argument on a tankie instance.

permalink
report
parent
reply
53 points
*

How do you feel about the age of consent?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

That really was unfair, age of consent and copyright are two issues on which libertarians are split.

How do you feel about free speech, due process, victimless crimes, freedom of conscience?

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

You don’t think anyone takes China seriously? You don’t think anyone took the USSR seriously?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Ukraine and South of Russia were parts of the USSR and it was buying grain abroad at the same time. Not because of not having grain production of enormous scale, but because it was abhorrently inefficient with typical Soviet quality of logistics.

USSR possessed simply enormous economic resources and strategic resources, but managed to misuse them to the degree of asking for humanitarian aid and then crash all by itself.

I would say that qualifies as “not being taken seriously”.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@hexbear.net

Create post

Protests, dual power, and even electoralism.

Labour and union posts go to !labour@www.hexbear.net.

Take the dunks to /c/strugglesession or !the_dunk_tank@www.hexbear.net.

!chapotraphouse@www.hexbear.net is good for shitposting.

Do not post direct links to reactionary sites.

Off topic posts will be removed.

Follow the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember we’re all comrades here.

Community stats

  • 1.5K

    Monthly active users

  • 2.3K

    Posts

  • 21K

    Comments