Made by Nume MacAroon at Veganism.social https://veganism.social/@nm

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
31 points
*
  • Embrace: Join the fediverse with your existing user base that dwarfs the fediverse’s existing user base, and with infinitely more money.
  • Extend: Use your size, in terms of users and capital, to steer the direction of the ActivityPub fediverse standard to your advantage and your competitors’ disadvantage. You see everyone else as a competitor because you are a corporation seeking to monopolize the user base for profit.
  • Extinguish: See what Google did to XMPP for a concrete example.
permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Or what Google does right now with Chrome and web standards.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

For those unaware of Google’s latest web browser malarkey: Web Environment Integrity

EFF/Cory Doctorow/Jacob Hoffman-Andrews: Your Computer Should Say What You Tell It To Say

Google is adding code to Chrome that will send tamper-proof information about your operating system and other software, and share it with websites. Google says this will reduce ad fraud. In practice, it reduces your control over your own computer, and is likely to mean that some websites will block access for everyone who’s not using an “approved” operating system and browser. It also raises the barrier to entry for new browsers, something Google employees acknowledged in an unofficial explainer for the new feature, Web Environment Integrity (WEI).

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I genuinely want Gopher back.

I want to share information and to communicate. I don’t want every bowel movement tracked and monetizes. I don’t want 30 cross site requests when going to a news site. A single story should not require 10MB of JavaScript libraries.

I have no doubt that most of the authors of the original internet are aghast at what their high-minded creation has itself created.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

The XMPP article was good, thanks!

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

But how would defederating prevent any of that?

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

It would make Threads unable to see content from instances defederating it and vice versa, preventing the Embrace step.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

That’s a common misconception actually, any and all data available via federation is already public and easily scrapable even without running an instance of one’s own. Defederating only hides (in this case) Threads content from users on the instance doing the defederating, but the data is still public. Not to mention copies of it would still be fully available on any extant federated instances.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

The same way we prevented any of that up ’till now: by doing our own thing on our own terms.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Fediverse

!fediverse@lemmy.ml

Create post

A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.

Fediverse is a portmanteau of “federation” and “universe”.

Getting started on Fediverse;

Community stats

  • 423

    Monthly active users

  • 962

    Posts

  • 14K

    Comments