New York’s governor vetoed a bill days before Christmas that would have banned noncompete agreements, which restrict workers’ ability to leave their job for a role with a rival business.

Gov. Kathy Hochul, who said she tried to work with the Legislature on a “reasonable compromise” this year, called the bill “a one-size-fits-all-approach” for New York companies legitimately trying to retain top talent.

“I continue to recognize the urgent need to restrict non-compete agreements for middle-class and low-wage workers, and am open to future legislation that achieves the right balance,” she wrote in a veto letter released Saturday.

The veto is a blow to labor groups, who have long argued that the agreements hurt workers and stifle economic growth. The Federal Trade Commission had also sent a letter to Hochul in November, urging her to sign the bill and saying that the agreements can harm innovation and prevent new businesses from forming in the state.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
1 point
*

Because they want to make it so it’s harder to leave for better pay, better benefits, or better hours.

Now can you answer my question?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I’m no sandwich artist so I can’t do more than speculate. If they’re zero skilled workers, why would there be a worry of attrition since literally anybody is capable of doing the job?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I didn’t say “zero skilled” I was careful with my words.

But even with low skill positions, there is still money lost in the acquisition and training. They are trying to avoid or minimize these losses with a basically free method: giving a way to legally threaten them from trying to move to other low skill positions nearby.

And it also helps them suppress wages in the area, saving them money. There are obvious non skill related reasons that one might try to stop workers from having the freedom move from one job to another.

The reality is that these aren’t high skilled positions. I’m not saying they aren’t hard or aren’t important, only they it’s generally speaking easier to find someone with the required skills to train for these jobs.

Based on the fact that noone can explain why they are actually high skill positions, I feel justified in this.

Fyi, it was a while ago, but I’ve worked in numerous places doing low skill work. I’m not coming from a place of ignorance.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

The person you argued against stated “non-skilled.” Are you now saying that you agree with them?

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 20K

    Posts

  • 521K

    Comments