I have no side to take, but itās sorta hilarious seeing people saying the award mean nothing when itās starfield that win it, and on the other hand congratulate Baldurās Gate for winning another GOTY. Truly the Schrodinger Award.
Games you liked winning awards is something to celebrate. Games you donāt like winning awards is proof that awards are a joke and should be ignored. Just how things work.
For real. The new in thing is to sit on any game you are mildly disappointed in and claim itās the worst game of all time and no one can like it.
For being the shittiest game of all time there sure are a lot of people (myself included) who put in nearly a hundred hours into it or even moreā¦
Everyone obsessed with absolutes these days, no place for middle ground or a measured response.
Yeah, but whether you like Starfield or not, can we all admit that itās for sure not most innovative?
What did it do thatās particularly new, innovative, or great?
To be fair, āgame of the yearā feels like itās meant to measure popularity, while āmost innovativeā sounds like it shouls measure how innovative a game is, which is perhaps why the two awards get such different reactions.
Well tbf as well, innovative is as subjective as game of the year, what seems to be innovative to some might not be one for another. Itās hard to define āinnovationā because itās simply a process of putting in change on an established thing. Try google āinnovative product of (year)ā and you might see a tons of āisnāt it just x but yā product.
In my case i havenāt played Starfield nor Baldurās Gate 3 so i wouldnāt know whether they deserve the award or not, if people think it does, hey, more power to them. Steam Award is a popularity contest voted by people anyway, taking it seriously is missing the point.
innovative is as subjective as game of the year
I donāt think Iāve actually heard a single person unironically assert Starfield is āinnovativeāā¦