You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
9 points

This change is interesting. The process of creating parameterized blueprints looks a little tedious, but I’m pretty sure that’s just inherent to the idea in general and there isn’t much room to make it better, and I imagine the ease of using such blueprints that are e.g. downloaded from the internet is perfectly fine.

I play a lot of Factorio in multiplayer, with a group where not everyone has the same desire to make blueprints, and we in-general resist just downloading designs off the internet and try to do everything in-house. This leads to a lot of asymmetric gameplay, where e.g. I may design a blueprint and others will use them. I think this kind of change will work well overall for that (complex train systems are now a reality) but might come with the cost of the blueprint producer spending more time faffing around with the blueprint UI.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

Not much faffing needed. The challenge is in creating blueprints that are truly suited to generic parametrization. It’s the same deal with generics in programming.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Factorio

!factorio@lemmy.ml

Create post

Dreaming of transport belts

Rules

  • All content must be Factorio related
  • No political content
  • Be nice

Last updated: 2023/06/05

Useful links

Purchase

Factorio has never been on sale and will (probably) never be on sale

Community stats

  • 170

    Monthly active users

  • 120

    Posts

  • 383

    Comments

Community moderators