lemm.ee

5 points

9 months ago

AI does not “read books” and it’s completely disingenuous to compare them to humans that way.

report

[ - ]

SCB@lemmy.world

-2 points

9 months ago

That’s certainly an opinion you have

report

[ - ]

6 points

9 months ago

Backed by technical facts.

AIs fundamentally process information differently than humans. That’s not up for debate.

report

[ - ]

SCB@lemmy.world

-5 points

9 months ago

Yes this is an argument in my favor, you just don’t understand AI/LLMs enough to know why.

report

[ - ]

8 points

9 months ago

I could say the same about you, considering I’ve watched you peddle false information for months about this subject.

AI learns differently than humans. That isn’t a fact up for debate. That’s one of the few objective truths around this industry.

report

[ - ]

SCB@lemmy.world

-9 points

9 months ago

I work with AI every day at my job. My buddy is a literal AI researcher and we hobby-build together too.

I’m not concerned with what you think is “objective truth” when you have no idea what you’re talking about.

report

[ - ]

https://www.rws.com/blog/large-language-models-humans/

6 points

9 months ago

Ok and?

That doesn’t mean it’s any less theft, or that you have any idea what you’re talking about.

https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/rjghymycfrMY2aRk5/llm-cognition-is-probably-not-human-like

There’s also countless papers on google scholar that point out the differences.

report

Show more comments

[ - ]

Bartsbigbugbag@lemmy.ml

3 points

9 months ago

You use an AI to help you come up with your talking points at your job at the IOF?

report

[ - ]

-4 points

9 months ago

Similarly I don’t read “War and Peace” and then use that to go and write “Peace and War”

report