Just because Republicans choose unreality doesn’t mean the media should ignore the facts of January 6.

On January 6, 2021, I watched CNN as thousands of Donald Trump supporters stormed the US Capitol. As someone well-versed in watching tragedy on television, I was struck by just how indisputable the facts were at the time: violent, red-hat-clad MAGA rioters, followed by Republicans in Congress, tried to stop democracy in its tracks. Trump had told his followers that the protest in Washington, DC, “will be wild,” and in the assault that followed his speech, some rioters smeared feces on the walls of the Capitol. Hundreds of them have since been convicted on charges ranging from assault on federal officers to seditious conspiracy. These are stubborn facts, the kind that do not care about your feelings. These facts include the inalienable truth that Trump is the first president in American history to reject the peaceful transfer of power.

It never occurred to me that these facts could somehow be perverted by partisanship. But three years later, we are seeing just that, as Republicans cling to the lie that the 2020 election was “stolen” by Joe Biden and are poised to make Trump their 2024 nominee. And perhaps even more dangerous than the GOP ditching reality is the news media’s inability to cover Trumpism as the threat to democracy that it very much is.

But the problem is, when all you have is conventional political framing, everything looks like politics as usual. One candidate makes a claim; the other disputes it. Two sides are divided, etc. This framing only works if both parties operate within the frameworks of a shared reality. But Trumpism doesn’t allow for the reality the rest of us inhabit. Trump’s supporters believe their leader’s reality and not, say, the reality the rest of us see with our eyes. As Trump once told a crowd: “Don’t believe the crap you see from these people, the fake news. What you’re seeing and what you’re reading is not what’s happening.”

Journalists may be well-intentioned in trying to be “objective,” or they’re simply afraid of being labeled partisan. Either way, coverage of January 6 that gives equal weight to both sides—one based in reality, one not—is helping pave the road for authoritarianism.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
0 points
*

You were the one saying first about the orangeoutan, wining, that is why I asked you that?

I don’t support Trump.

Then you are downplaying by inferring that the republicans aren’t as warmongers as the democrats.

I never said that.

Lol, you think that saying war is downplaying?

If you’re saying it because you refuse to call the genocide you live to support a genocide because Biden supports it, YES.

I mean you only compared centrists and democrats

I didn’t mention Democrats apart from genocidal centrists’ torchbearer Biden. I resent having all opposition to genocide immediately framed in bad faith as support for Trump by people who won’t even call it a genocide.

It’s like watching Republicans call January 6 a “protest.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Sure bud, a centrist, that doesn’t complain about the conservatives. Sure bud.

Also republicans, remember, rhr have a house mayority, and can easily avoid the “evil” democrats that you complain about.

I asked you a question which so far you still haven’t answered, and i am still waiting to see in my fist comment where I stated that you were a orangeoutan supporter. But yet you claimed that I supported genocide… but sure bud, to which I never did, and ye mt you still claim… irony or hypocrisy, which ine is it?

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Sure bud, a centrist, that doesn’t complain about the conservatives. Sure bud.

Also republicans, remember, rhr have a house mayority, and can easily avoid the “evil” democrats that you complain about.

I asked you a question which so far you still haven’t answered, and i am still waiting to see in my fist comment where I stated that you were a orangeoutan supporter. But yet you claimed that I supported genocide… but sure bud, to which I never did, and ye mt you still claim… irony or hypocrisy, which ine is it?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I’ve answered your question multiple times. You’ve ignored it every time.

You have done nothing but hurl baseless accusations and insults while refusing to condemn or even acknowledge that genocide is happening and that the US is supporting it. You keep downplaying it and calling it “war” like some January 6 apologist calling it a “protest.”

For the final time: I am not a Republican. I do not support Trump.

I asked you to stop polluting my inbox with your genocide apologia.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Removed, most of the comment is on point. The Ad Hominem is not. Rule 3.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

He was doing thr ad hominem, how comes that I got the message deleted and not him?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

And yet my point still stands, do you think the republicans would do better?

Of course not. Let me make this clear: Just because I don’t like that Biden is supporting genocide, that doesn’t mean I support Republicans or think they would be less bad on genocide than Biden has been. I’ve said this multiple times and you’ve ignored it every last time.

Democrats should stop supporting genocide.

i can assume that you are a conservative or a russian bot, who won’t say a bad thing about republicans or the orangeoutan.

You started with that assumption because I’m critical of Biden’s support for Netanyahu’s genocide. Don’t pollute my inbox again with your disgusting genocide apologia.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 14K

    Posts

  • 412K

    Comments