@yogthos 5. Use of emotionally charged language: The words like âhysteriaâ, âatrocitiesâ, ârampagesâ play with the emotions of the readers, leading them to take sides without looking into the facts.
Such manipulation could be intended to steer readers towards a particular point of view on these complex geopolitical issues.
Writing âobjectivelyâ is also biased, it just supports the status quo. I actually think itâs more deceitful to try and hide support of the status quo behind so called âobjective languageâ, yog makes no effort to hide that heâs a communist and that is his bias.
For instance, the status quo opinion is that Israel is 100% justified in genocidng Palestinians. Couching our language to âlet people come to their own conclusionsâ directly supports that genocide
Please keep your eyes open in the future to the media also using these terms. For example, every single time a peaceful protest gets pushed by the police into going violent. See how the media uses extremely charged verbiage during those situations.
Or how about every single time China or North Korea or Russia is brought up. No matter what the news story is about, they will always be labeled the bad guys. And sometimes they are, but sometimes theyâre not.
Notice how the media will always talk about their âregimesâ compare to our âgovernmentâ, their âworker campsâ vs our âprisonsâ. By the way our prisons also do force labor, and also torture people. How come our prisons arenât worker camps? Or torture camps?
Youâre going to see this if you keep watching osely, Communists have been talking about politically charged rhetoric for a very long time. We started calling out the government for using biased language long ago. See: Michael Parenti, for starters.
Use of emotionally charged language: The words like âhysteriaâ, âatrocitiesâ, ârampagesâ play with the emotions of the readers, leading them to take sides without looking into the facts.
This applies 10 fold to virtually all western media coverage of the Ukraine war.
You could only find few words to base your thesis of manipulation when a news article gone contrary to what you have been manipulated to believe. You sure it isnât really you who have been manipulated to believe in what you believe considering the media you consume is the one that uses those words heavily, creating a matrix of misinformation making it really difficult for you to keep your world view unaffected by that matrix you live in.
