You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
-1 points

Well I’m not arguing it’ll be worse. The opposite. I’m speculating on the mechanism. Personally I’d argue in favour of replacing the damn stop signs with yield. Then you leave less to the road users’interpretation. Every car driver passing through the yield sign will also be aware it’s a yield for the next time they drive on the orthogonal street.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Maybe. I just imagine that there are a lot of streets where a yield sign isn’t appropriate, such as an intersection where one direction is high speed and the other has poor visibility. Bicycles can stop much more quickly than cars, so perhaps it’s less safe to make more intersections into yields.

Then again, we could probably use a lot more yields than stop signs in general.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Bicycles

!bicycles@lemmy.ca

Create post

Welcome to !bicycles@lemmy.ca

A place to share our love of all things with two wheels and pedals. This is an inclusive, non-judgemental community. All types of cyclists are accepted here; whether you’re a commuter, a roadie, a MTB enthusiast, a fixie freak, a crusty xbiking hoarder, in the middle of an epic across-the-world bicycle tour, or any other type of cyclist!


Community Rules

  • No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.

  • Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.

  • No porn.

  • No ads / spamming.

  • Ride bikes


Other cycling-related communities

Community stats

  • 388

    Monthly active users

  • 277

    Posts

  • 3K

    Comments

Community moderators