You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
36 points
*

What your code can do is run this first and if it returns false then do a quick double check using a traditional isPrime function. Really speeds things up!

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Better. Return true if the number is in a stored list of known primes, otherwise return false right away. But then, start a separate thread with an actual verification algorithm. When the verification is done, if it was actually a prime number, you just crash the program with a WasActuallyPrime exception.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Good idea, but it would be much faster if you do the double-check on true instead.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

This is a power(ful) idea.

Are my stats/programmers in the house?

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

I mean, it has a 99.999%+ success rate on a large enough sample and I can live with that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Nah, you’ve always got to check the corner cases. It’s a variation on Murphy’s Law - you don’t encounter corner cases when you’re developing a program but corner cases are 99 percent of an everyday user’s interaction.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Programmer Humor

!programmer_humor@programming.dev

Create post

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

  • Keep content in english
  • No advertisements
  • Posts must be related to programming or programmer topics

Community stats

  • 7.7K

    Monthly active users

  • 977

    Posts

  • 38K

    Comments