You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
12 points

Trump has repeatedly said in impromptu rants at his trial that the case is a meritless, political “witch hunt” because he is richer than the statements sent to banks suggest, and lenders didn’t care about those figures anyway because they always did their own analysis, always got paid back in full and continued to lend to him.

Really? Didn’t he originally have to turn to Deutsche Bank, and later the Russians and Saudis, because American banks (and then other banks) refused to lend to him anymore?

permalink
report
reply
8 points

Yeah, the real questions are “Which banks are lending to Trump?” and “Does any bank loan to Trump more than once?”

permalink
report
parent
reply

Denver Post Comment Section

!denver_post_comments@lemmy.world

Create post

A place for ex-pats from the Denver Post comment section (closing down in July), as well as people that want to discuss Denver Post articles in general.

Community stats

  • 477

    Monthly active users

  • 1.3K

    Posts

  • 2.4K

    Comments

Community moderators