In an attempt to deal with an affordable housing crisis, the Dutch housing minister recently proposed a law that would have allowed municipalities to force some property owners to sell their homes only to low and middle-income earners. The problem the policy is trying to fix is one that’s particularly acute in Canada.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
6 points

Here’s an easier solution: make real estate a poor investment by raising property taxes. It either works (great) or it doesn’t (also great, because now the government has more money and more resources to build out infrastructure and housing).

permalink
report
reply
12 points

That would put a lot of pressure on those who are struggling.

Taxes should be income based.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

The city already has programs in place to reduce and write off property tax bills from people who are struggling.

Income is a poor measure of wealth.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

You can make the tax apply only to corporate owners, or properties that are not an individual’s primary residence.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Yes that would be a good idea. Disincentivise hoarders.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I’m in the lowest tax bracket. I only made about $34k last year. The amount of income tax I paid was equivalent to about 25% of my total wealth.

Calculate 25% of your total wealth. How would it feel to pay that much in taxes? Because that’s how much I paid.

Fuck income tax.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

What province do you live in?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Taxes being income based puts more pressure on those who are struggling than land value or wealth taxes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Taxes should be income based.

I think taxes should be mostly wealth based, not income based.

You want to know why?

Because it’s easy for some rich bastard to report zero income while having billions in assets.

Someone who already can’t make end’s meet would feel the sting of any amount of taxation in day-to-day life compared to a billionaire.

Wealth hoarding should be severely taxed. You want more land than humanly acceptable? Six houses at 10,000sq+ each? 15 cars? A tennis court and equestrian ranch for friends and family? Fine, get ready to pay a lot for it on an ongoing basis.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

well not across the board, we want to discourage investment purchasing, not owning a family home. Multiple dwellings should be taxed extremely high, and shell corporations who buy and rent homes need to somehow be cracked down on.

Or why not tax income made from rental homes to an insane degree - need to make renting out homes not attractive to investors. If there is little benefit to renting out dwellings, it might encourage investors to sell off homes. Further encourage selling to non-wealthy people through more tax incentives or something.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Stepped tax rates for each property you own.

1st property normal rates.

2nd property 2x normal rate

3rd property 3x normal rate etc.

Need to figure out how to ban shell corporation ownership of property though.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Canada

!canada@lemmy.ca

Create post

What’s going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta

🗺️ Provinces / Territories

🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

🏒 Sports

Hockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Universities

💵 Finance / Shopping

🗣️ Politics

🍁 Social and Culture

Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


Community stats

  • 2.8K

    Monthly active users

  • 5.8K

    Posts

  • 53K

    Comments

Community moderators