Examples could be things like specific configuration defaults or general decision-making in leadership.
What would you change?
(Arch, btw)
Technical: Better, easier to use APIs for pacman. The last time I tried to do alpm stuff, it wasn’t fun.
Social: Less rtfm. The manual is good, but it’s not cool when people are super elitist (especially towards newbies).
The manual is OK, much of it’s out dated and often outright wrong. It is still a great document.
Edits to the wiki are often knocked back if they weren’t made by the inner circle, discussions on the back page are often closed and frankly the TUs are mostly wankers. The forum policy on necro-bumping leaves half answers everywhere but the notion of “put it in the wiki” is undermined by the toxic community among inner party members.
Arch is a great middle ground between Fedora and Gentoo, but I had to walk away because the community was so toxic and childish.
I’m using void and Gentoo now and I’m pretty happy, anything that doesn’t run works in a container anyway.
TL;DR: community behaviour is much more important to me than technical use.
Not just for arch but the community in general is also really quick to suggest you change the technology you’re using.
I’ve had a couple occasions before where I’ve mentioned a problem and people immediately tell me to use their window manager of choice instead because it’s better
