103

NYT is now openly talking about a peace deal in which Ukraine would have to remain neutral and give up territory(www.nytimes.com)

posted
by
Avatar
☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmygrad.ml
in
Avatar
ukraine_war_news@lemmygrad.ml
48 comments
hidereport
Sort:
HotTopControversialNewOld
You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
Avatar
multitotal@lemmygrad.ml
39 points

And to think that Ukraine could have given up Luhansk and Donetsk early on, avoided the destruction and demographic collapse. Now anything of value will be sold off in hopes that some of that money will go towards rebuilding it.

permalink
report
reply
Avatar
cubaenjoyer@lemmygrad.ml
31 points

Not even given up. The original plan vented was more autonomy, respect russian language and persecute who commited crimes post euromaidan. Crimea status though they won’t get back.

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
multitotal@lemmygrad.ml
2 points

I meant after Minsk II agreement fell through and right when the war started.

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmygrad.mlOP
42 points

“It may be dangerous to be America’s enemy, but to be America’s friend is fatal.”

― Henry Kissinger

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
trashxeos@lemmygrad.ml
38 points

Fun fact about Henry Kissinger, he’s dead now. 🦀

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmygrad.mlOP
32 points

The tragedy is that he lived a comfortable life without ever being prosecuted for his crimes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
Show more comments

Death to NATO

!ukraine_war_news@lemmygrad.ml

Create post

For posting news about NATO’s wars in Ukraine, Serbia, Kosovo, and The Middle East, including anywhere else NATO is currently engaged in hostile actions. As well as anything that relates to it.

Rules:

  • Follow Site Rules

  • No support nor defence of Western-backed governments, NATO or Western Imperialism

Community stats

  • 209

    Monthly active users

  • 681

    Posts

  • 4.8K

    Comments

Community moderators