An abandoned mine in Finland is set to be transformed into a giant battery to store renewable energy during periods of excess production.

The Pyhäsalmi Mine, roughly 450 kilometres north of Helsinki, is Europe’s deepest zinc and copper mine and holds the potential to store up to 2 MW of energy within its 1,400-metre-deep shafts.

The disused mine will be fitted with a gravity battery, which uses excess energy from renewable sources like solar and wind in order to lift a heavy weight. During periods of low production, the weight is released and used to power a turbine as it drops.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
10 points

This is one of those ideas that in hindsight seem so simple and obvious that it makes one wonder how nobody thought of it prior. Absolutely brilliant.

permalink
report
parent
reply
40 points

They have done this before, only instead of using a big weight, they use water. Lookup “Dinorwig Power Station” for a good example.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Banks Lake in the US has been doing it for quite awhile too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

That’s similar but different in a lot of meaningful ways. Hydro pumping like that requires a relatively large body of water next to a large geographical height right nearby. This new system doesn’t require any water, and it uses a man made hole in the ground that’s already been created and which otherwise would be simply unused

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

It’s what we call a double whammy. Paid to remove the metals and then paid for the hole you’ve made.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Bonus, it starts fully charged since the weight is inserted at the apex of the battery instead of having to be lifted.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I read of another it was the same physics but different scenario. I think it was like excess energy moves heavy carts up a hill. When energy is needed, these carts get released and their potential energy from hill and the basic idea of regenerative breaking to repurpose it’s kinetic energy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Yes, and they use lakes of water to have enough mass to make it worthwhile. No weight down a mineshaft is worth it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

Because it’s super inefficient

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Not if the energy would go to waste. This is a mechanical battery to store surplus power generation from things like wind and solar.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

That’s the whole point of grid energy storage. Even if there are losses, it’s acceptable considering that otherwise you would need to burn fossil fuels in a peaker plant to keep the grid balanced. You aren’t supposed to recharge a battery like this with fossil fuels.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It wouldn’t go to waste if we were to use “gravity batteries” that have existed for centuries: hydropower

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Is it more or less efficient than a derelict mine and an unstored energy surplus?

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

No it’s not.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.ml

Create post

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

Community stats

  • 4.2K

    Monthly active users

  • 2.8K

    Posts

  • 45K

    Comments

Community moderators