You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
30 points

Well, if training is included, then why it is not included for the developer? From his first days of his life?

permalink
report
reply
6 points

The difference is that the dev paid for their training themselves

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Sort of… If the dev didn’t pay for their training, they wouldn’t need as big of a wage to pay off their training debt (the usual scenario I’d wager).

So in a way the company is currently paying off the debt for the Devs training, most of the time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

The company OpenAI also paid for LLM training and then sell LLM to users.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

When did the training happen? The LLM is trained for the task starting when the task is assigned. The developer’s training has already completed, for this task at least.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points
*

No? The LLM was trained before you ever even interacted with it. They’re not going to train a model on the fly each time you want to use it, that’s fucking ridiculous.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

That’s the joke that the comic is making. Whether or not it’s reflective of reality, they’re joking about a company training a new AI model to calculate the area of rectangles.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

And even if they do need to train a model, transfer learning is often a viable shortcut

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

Programmer Humor

!programmerhumor@lemmy.ml

Create post

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

  • Posts must be relevant to programming, programmers, or computer science.
  • No NSFW content.
  • Jokes must be in good taste. No hate speech, bigotry, etc.

Community stats

  • 3.9K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.5K

    Posts

  • 35K

    Comments