lemm.ee

-11 points

9 months ago

An overwhelming number of people seem to think that either intention or whether you were charged are relevant to the question here:
https://lemmy.ml/comment/8298237

report

[ - ]

Big P@feddit.uk

9 points

9 months ago

That’s a different question entirely

report

[ - ]

-10 points

9 months ago

how so?

report

[ - ]

rufus@discuss.tchncs.de

5 points

9 months ago

Because the second paragraph of the article says it could not be established that anyone was speeding at all?

report

[ - ]

-4 points

9 months ago

what? youre talking about the joemygod(dot)com article?
its pretty biased and if you read the pdf you can search for Zwonitzer: you can find tons of examples of biden bragging about having the classified material. So its pretty well-established that joe had the info and knew he had the info. so he broke the law.

report

[ - ]

Big P@feddit.uk

6 points

9 months ago

So really the question should be “if you are alleged to have been speeding, but some people are reporting that there is no evidence that you were speeding and some others are saying that source is biased - did you break the law?”

report

[ - ]

-2 points

9 months ago

So youre suggesting that if someone says I wasn’t speeding we should disregard the audio tape of me bragging about speeding?

report

Show more comments

[ - ]

hedgehog@ttrpg.network

3 points

9 months ago

If a law requires then intent then of course intent is relevant.

report