Previously LGPL, now re-licensed as closed-source/commercial. Previous code taken down.

Commercial users pay $99/year, free for personal use but each user has to make a free account after a trial period.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
1 point

Yeah if you really care about FOSS you should use GPL and not MIT BDS and a multiple license. Because at the end of the day the code can became close source in just a second. That is the point of GPL and the Foss. I am willing to pay with money because I can. But I am not willing to pay with trust.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

What? The GPL would have offered no more protection for this exact scenario than the LGPL (or any other license for that matter).

permalink
report
parent
reply

Python

!python@programming.dev

Create post

Welcome to the Python community on the programming.dev Lemmy instance!

📅 Events
October 2023
November 2023
Past

July 2023

August 2023

September 2023

🐍 Python project:
💓 Python Community:
✨ Python Ecosystem:
🌌 Fediverse
Communities
Projects
  • Pythörhead: a Python library for interacting with Lemmy
  • Plemmy: a Python package for accessing the Lemmy API
  • pylemmy pylemmy enables simple access to Lemmy’s API with Python
  • mastodon.py, a Python wrapper for the Mastodon API
Feeds

Community stats

  • 428

    Monthly active users

  • 443

    Posts

  • 2.1K

    Comments