354

Hot take: LLM technology is being purposefully framed as AI to avoid accountability

posted
by
Avatar
assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
in
Avatar
technology@lemmy.world
104 comments
hidereport

Which of the following sounds more reasonable?

  • I shouldn’t have to pay for the content that I use to tune my LLM model and algorithm.

  • We shouldn’t have to pay for the content we use to train and teach an AI.

By calling it AI, the corporations are able to advocate for a position that’s blatantly pro corporate and anti writer/artist, and trick people into supporting it under the guise of a technological development.

Sort:
HotTopControversialNewOld
You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
Avatar
MxM111@kbin.social
-3 points

And what are they doing? To remind, OpenAI is non-profit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
Starfarer@kbin.social
6 points

I thought they moved to for profit back in 2019?

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
MxM111@kbin.social
0 points

Wikipedia lists them as non-profit https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenAI

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
BetaDoggo_@lemmy.world
1 point

They’re a non-profit managed by a for-profit, who’s received most of their funding from another for-proft.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

Community stats

  • 18K

    Monthly active users

  • 11K

    Posts

  • 517K

    Comments

Community moderators