You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
15 points

Everybody hates politicians. Super easy to criticize any particular politician, and not likely to generate much angry feedback.

Trump is a fucking goldmine of material. The sheer diversity of his bullshit means that no one topic stays relevant for very long.

Biden, though? You’ve got age and Israel, and Israel has way too much other stuff associated to bring up in mixed company. The reason people harp so much on Biden’s age is because there’s nothing else they can talk about.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

You’re replying from a liberal point of view. I also disagree with how he’s doing student loan forgiveness, marijuana, and how he’s still pushing roads instead of public transportation.

He’s also preventing Warren from being president while she’s still “young”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points
*

The reason people harp so much on Biden’s age is because there’s nothing else they can talk about.

Climate change, we have record breaking fossil fuels production and still subsidizing it.

Economy, only good for the 1%, Biden keeps bragging about it.

Healthcare, just ignoring it

Cannabis, Biden ain’t even going to deregulate which was his campaign promises

Education, K-12 still terrible, student loans that have been forgiven isn’t even a rounding error in total debt

Policing/legal system, still absolutely fucked, not being addressed

SC, won’t admit it needs fixed

Abortion, Biden won’t take action. Just says trump would make it worse again.

Do I need to continue?

Biden disagrees with his voters on lots of things, just because people are focused on a few, doesn’t mean the rest disappeared.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

Funny how everything you mention that Biden isn’t good at, Trump is way way worse and actively sabotage many of them, and most of the things aren’t help because Repubtards are blocking it.

Do I need to continue?

No you aren’t going anywhere anyway.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

Why would a starving man object to a shit sandwich?

It’s better than starving…

I’ll eat the shit sandwich if it’s my only choice, but others might not.

So how about we offer a pb&j to everyone and they’ll all make the smart choice?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Criticizing a President/candidate for things he hasn’t done is pretty ineffective, because the easy answer is, “the other party is blocking him.” Most of your criticisms require a five minute conversation to articulate your position, because they’re actually hard policy questions, and don’t fit into a TV soundbite: they’re a whole other category than “He’s too old,” or “He’s sexually assaulted 18 women.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points
*

Exactly, his flaws that fit into TV sound bites and headlines are the ones that get brought up the most…

That doesn’t mean the rest magically don’t exist and people don’t care about them.

That’s just the reason they dont get brought up the most.

And the other party would try to block them, but at least Biden could be trying so instead of a hypothetical he could point at when and where they blocked it.

Progressives dont want everything fixed immediately, I mean, it’d be nice.

But we’re not used to getting stuff, a president who tries is more than enough to get us excited.

Which is why it’s so frustrating Biden doesn’t even try

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 14K

    Posts

  • 414K

    Comments