I know there are other ways of accomplishing that, but this might be a convenient way of doing it. I’m wondering though if Reddit is still reverting these changes?

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
6 points

Wouldn’t be hard to scan a user and say:

  • they existed for 5 years.
  • they made something like 5 comments a day. They edit 1 or 2 comments a month.
  • then randomly on March 7th 2024 they edited 100% of all comments across all subs.
  • use comment version March 6th 2024
permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

It would.

First you’d need to notice the problem. Does Google even realise that some people want to edit their Reddit content to boycott LLM training?

Let’s say that Google did it. Then it’d need to come up with a good (generalisable, low amount of false positives, low amount of false negatives) set of rules to sort those out. And while coming up with “random” rules is easy, good ones take testing, trial and error, and time.

But let’s say that Google still does it. Now it’s retrieving and processing a lot more info from the database than just the content and its context, but also account age, when the piece of content was submitted, when it was edited.

So doing it still increases the costs associated with the corpus, making it less desirable.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Huh? Reddit has all of this plus changes in their own DBs. Google has nothing to do with this, it’s pre handover.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
*

I’m highlighting that having the data is not enough, if you don’t find a good way to use the data to sort the trash out. Google will need to do it, not Reddit; Reddit is only handing the data over.

Is this clear now? If you’re still struggling to understand it, refer to the context provided by the comment chain, including your own comments.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

It sounds like what’s needed here is a version of this tool that makes the edits slowly, at random intervals, over a period of time. And perhaps has the ability to randomize the text in each edit so that they’re all unusable garbage, but different unusable garbage (like the suggestion of taking ChatGPT output at really high temp that someone else made). Maybe it also only edits something like 25% of your total comment pool, and perhaps makes unnoticeably minor edits (add a space, remove a comma) to a whole bunch of other comments. Basically masking the poison by hiding it in a lot of noise?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Now you’re talkin .

Intra comment edit threshold would be fun to explore

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 18K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 542K

    Comments