154 points

Next time, Gort will install Debian and save himself the trouble

permalink
report
reply
16 points

I wish I could have it as easy as Gort. I miss my debian but I want that ZFS built into my kernel.

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points

There is so many distros that are just ubuntu without snaps, is just a matter of picking one of them

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Over time, Canonical will replace close to everything with Snaps. Ubuntu Remixes are not the solution. They just count towards Ubuntu’s installed base and validate Canonical.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Do you know if they use ubuntu’s kernel? That is my sticking point.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

can you name a few?

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Check out the kernel packages from Proxmox, they build ZFS into a debian kernel.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Yo! Best advice I’ve gotten, thank you!

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

You’re looking for Gentoo.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Unless I’m missing something, Gentoo uses out of tree kernel modules. https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/ZFS#Installation

Ubuntu actually bakes it into the kernel for you. I prefer having it in the kernel after having to deal with failed kernel upgrades several times in a row.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Well, you won’t have that much longer.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Oh? What’s going on?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

The current most popular distribution is MX Linux (based on Debian Stable), which I use. You certainly don’t have to, but I would say least start with a distro that respects you and adheres to FOSS standards…

Edit: context

permalink
report
parent
reply
81 points

Honestly, instead of trying to remove Snap from Ubuntu, I’d just install another distro (PopOS for example is mostly like Ubuntu but with Flatpak instead of Snap)

permalink
report
reply
8 points

Oh, is there a point using PopOS even if I replace the WM?

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Pop is great, even without the wm. The app store is top notch, if you’re into that sort of thing. Basically it’s Ubuntu minus snaps, so slightly more modern Debian, with good flatpak integration making up for all apt’s drawbacks. Perfect for the computer you want to be able to use without dealing with out of date packages or rolling release tinkering.

Even so, the wm is worth taking the time to get familiar with, because it’s intuitive enough for a non power user, and you’re not going to approach its efficiency in terms of workflow unless you can consistently use several dozen keyboard shortcuts on a more bare bones tiling wm. Anyway, that’s my opinion, having used a wide variety of window managers since the 90s.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

What’s “wm”?

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Been using pop for months now. The one thing I have a complaint about my part has to do with Steam. I was drawn to Pop because it had good Nvidia support out the box. Steam flatpak is fine but it can’t do some things that the normal deb version can, such as accessing other drives you may have steam games installed on, or that you want to install them on. You have to make some sacrifices with your library setup and your freedom with it when using flatpak.

It took me a while.to figure this out. I like to share it when I can. The deb version of steam is much nicer to use.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Yea, I see. I use xmonad tailored to my needs tho, so that is why I want to use mu owb WM.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

Yeah! Has good power management utilities and bonus features. but personally I’d stick to GNOME/Cosmic if you had Pop installed. You miss out on that integration otherwise.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Yeah, switching to Pop! Next time I do any major fucking around.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

How about Devuan?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

but with Flatpak instead of Snap

Same shit. Install Gentoo.

permalink
report
parent
reply
64 points

Installs Ubuntu.
It is Ubuntu.
Gets angry.

permalink
report
reply
13 points

Gort is not angry. Gort is calm.

permalink
report
parent
reply
49 points

Help me understand. Why would you install a distribution, just to gut what’s making it what it is, instead of just getting anything else? Just from Debian derivative perspective, if you hate snaps, why not install something like LMDE Mint, if you need a complete out of the box distro?

permalink
report
reply
33 points

I think mainly because a ton of open source software will be tested with Ubuntu, and I don’t want another thing that could possibly be the problem when it fails to build on my machine.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

Problem is that by “unsnapping”, you deviate from “Ubuntu”. You start having to add all sorts of third party packages, and the more that is needed, the more the value of aligning with a well tested baseline diminishes. Notably, Ubuntu declares an intent to make everything snaps, including the kernel and bootloader.

So it would seem more productive for someone railing against snap to avoid using Ubuntu and avoid bolstering the reputation of something they fundamentally disagree with.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

This is why I often choose an Ubuntu derivative like Pop_OS. Most of the same underlying structure with none of the snaps.

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points

Just use Debian or Linux Mint Debian Edition and call it a day.

permalink
report
reply

linuxmemes

!linuxmemes@lemmy.world

Create post

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:

Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules
2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of “peasantry” to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can’t quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

Community stats

  • 6.6K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.3K

    Posts

  • 71K

    Comments