I’m relatively new to programming, I’ve been learning C on linux using nano and it’s been very fun. I’ve recently fallen into the emacs/vim rabbithole and I’ve been watching videos about emacs, Doom, spacemacs, neovim and reading comments about people switching from this or that to another config or editor, and I’ve been a bit lost on what to do. Then I realised that I haven’t done any coding and spent all of my time focusing on editors. So here is my question (which has probably been asked many times) : what is the point of investing so much time learning all of this when there are some IDEs that are preconfigured with all the functionality a programmer would need ? Does learning neovim or emacs actually save time in the long run? I know that they’re much more lightweight than IDEs and I’ve been really enjoying using the terminal much more than my time on IntelliJ, but having an easy out of the box visual debugger, refactoring and jump into functions can be really helpful in the long run I think, especially when starting to write actual large programs. Nano is fun, but not a time saver. Why did you chose your editor?
There’s nothing saying you have to use one editor. My main editor is VSCode, but if I need to say edit a config variable on my server, or hot fix a script, knowing Vim is useful. Or I might use Rider for C#, etc. Vim (and emacs, nano and others) are usually always available on Linux servers, making it very quick to poke around, which makes them attractive to a lot of linux enthusiasts.
Choose the editor you find the best for the current job. If you prefer the full IDE experience, go for it. If you want a lighter editor, then use that. If you just want to learn the different terminal editors, there’s no fault in that, it can be fun to master something.
Agreed, different editors give different look and feel. An IDE is good because of lots of clever things it can do, but most of them could be replicated in Vim with proper plugins.
Though to be hones I never had the nerve to properly set up Vim, so use it only for small scale stuff :-)
Regarding Vim vs Emacs vs Any other editor it all boils down to what you will like more, although you should probably give it a bit more than one time to get better acquainted woth the quirks and advantages of a specific variant.
To answer your question directly, there are some presets available on the internet that show how to set up Vim (Emacs too, I guess, but I only have experience with Vim) for development in a specific language. Those presets allow for a pretty fast set up and you only need to learn basics then.
Still, compared to UI-based IDE, I’d say that those are handier. After all, most of the time you spend is usually spent on thinking, not traversing the code or typing one. So whatever advantages you will get from navigating Vim quicker they can’t be a major difference in dev speed.
TLDR; choose what feels better, there are plugins for lots of things in console and vice versa, but don’t invest too heavily in an instrument you don’t like after several tries.
what is the point of investing so much time learning all of this when there are some IDEs that are preconfigured with all the functionality a programmer would need ?
Editors are a thing you use a lot. They are probably one of the most used tools you will ever use as a programmer. If anything deserve some time investment to learn it is the editor you use. Doing so will pay dividends in the long term. Even one that is preconfigured requires time to learn all those features and how to use them effectively. Time spent configuring is just time spent exploring the features the editor has to offer. Vim and Emacs force you to do this to become on par with other editors, but just because another editor has the tools built in does not mean you don’t still need to spend the time to learn those tools.
Does learning neovim or emacs actually save time in the long run?
Lots of people think so. I personally hate using normal editors these days, modal editors like vim are just far nicer to use and lets me jump around and edit code far faster than normal editors. I cannot comment on emacs though.
I know that they’re much more lightweight than IDEs and I’ve been really enjoying using the terminal much more than my time on IntelliJ, but having an easy out of the box visual debugger, refactoring and jump into functions can be really helpful in the long run I think
You can get all these things in terminal editors. Especially with the LSP (language server protocol) vim and similar editors can support all of the language servers that were created for vscode giving you the same refactoring tools as available in vscode. It is mostly a question of finding the right plug-ins that you require.
Why did you chose your editor?
I learnt vim in uni - cannot remember why exactly any more. But ever since I properly learnt it I have not been able to move back to normal editors anymore. They just feel far more clunky than modal ones. Yes you can get the vim input mode on vscode and other editors - but they are always lacking compaire to the real thing.
Recently though I have switch to helix which is a modal terminal editor inspired by neovim and kakoune - takes the keybinding from kakoune but integrates LSP and treesitter in addition to a lot of the common plugins that you have in vim. I love that it requires basically no configuration to give you what is more of a fully functional IDE but still has all the power of a modal editor. It lacks a plugin architecture though (this is still a work in progress feature) but since it bakes in a lot of what you typically go to plugins for I have never felt it lacking by missing this feature.
As an alternative to helix, there are lots of preconfigured/opinionated vim/neovim setups. Lunarvim (my choice), chadvim (I think is the name), and more.
All the benefits of the vim plugins etc. With sane defaults. You still have to take time learning everything, and I would probably recommend spending time with configuring a vanilla neovin config to understand how it works then jumping into one of these later, but I’ve found it saves a lot of time configuring and gives you a fantastic starting point.
I have tried some of these before - and they always felt a bit janky compared to something with everything built in like Helix. You still have to keep lots of plugins up to date and installation is IMO kinda dodgy on most of them - having to run some script to mess with your home directory settings. As someone that like to manage config via config managers I always found these install methods get in the way for me. And they are so complex that manually setting them up is also a huge pain.
Where as helix just works as you would expect straight from your distros repo.
That’s valid, especially the complexity issue. Everything mostly works, until it doesn’t. And if you have some sort of dep issue or otherwise, you’re now combing through lots of scripts to try to narrow it down and fix it unless you wait for an update.
Personally still find I have saved a lot of time using a preconfiged setup, though everyone could have different experiences.
I learned vim when working at a company where pair programming was encouraged and most people used vim. The keybindings and macro features are pretty nice for avoiding strain on your hands. It was nice if you needed to do development on a remote host for some reason. Since I left that company I have stopped using it almost entirely in favor of VSCode. VSCode has vim bindings emulation if you like them. I still use vim sometimes if I’m already in a shell.
Editing in (neo)vim is akin to live programming in a very terse programming language. You can also create your own commands (keybindings) and repeat snippets multiple times (macros). This is amazingly powerful if you need to convert between two formats or extract some information.
The UI is not a highlight of this editor.
It also takes years before selecting the commands becomes mostly subconscious. It is definitely a long term investment.
