Ads from household-name brands and nonprofits are appearing beside clips of a film blaming Jews for causing World War II.

33 points

The fact that all those companies are still advertising on there is disheartening

permalink
report
reply
9 points

It’s just about the balance sheet…

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Always has been 👩🏽‍🚀🔫👩🏽‍🚀

Companies have no moral, if they could get more money by selling children to the highest bidder, they would.
Many already make use of child labour in asian countries anyway.
Not to speak about the changing laws in some US states lowering minimum age for working, bringing back child labour.
It’s always money.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Ding ding ding. What we’re seeing is a bunch of other tech bro dickheads following Elon’s lead because despite everyone hating everything he did, Twitter hasn’t fully failed yet. They’re all seeing dollar signs and could not give a single fuck about their users or the experience they have on their platform as long as they can make a few more bucks.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

“Nazis buy shoes, too.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

I stopped advertising there years ago. I have a 501©3 and I couldn’t allow my charity to be trashed for simply existing. They cater to the angriest people on the planet. I hope that doesn’t replicate itself here.

permalink
report
reply
21 points

Twitter also used to not put ads on the same screen as any post labelled as “Sensitive Content,” they removed that restriction a few weeks ago I noticed.

permalink
report
reply
15 points

Twitter is slowly eating itself, and it’s almost funny to see it.

permalink
report
reply
6 points

But also I can’t help feeling sad because Twitter has been valuable for so many reasons to a lot of people.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Well yeah, at it’s best it was 100% a force for good. It’s not at it’s best any more.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

No business is a force for good. They are all there to make a profit. If they appear to be doing good, it’s because that image is one that they feel is profitable. It can change at a moment’s notice if they decide that going a different direction is profitable (e.g. Twitter).

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I met my ex-wife on Twitter. It can go to hell. 🌚

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

While I agree this is a problem, it should be noted that the youtube adpocolips was triggered by similar concern on cherry picked examples that hurt creators in the end. We should be promoting the idea that algorithmically served ads are not an endorsement of what they are served with. The neo nazi stuff is a content moderation problem that needs to be fixed because of … you know … gestures broadly.

permalink
report
reply
8 points

I’d rather watch Twitter burn under Musks feet.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Except Twitter does not view it as a content moderation problem and users of Twitter don’t benefit from ads. If Elon wants ad revenue he should ban these people from the platform, instead he does the opposite.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!tech@kbin.social

Create post

This magazine is dedicated to discussions on the latest developments, trends, and innovations in the world of technology. Whether you are a tech enthusiast, a developer, or simply curious about the latest gadgets and software, this is the place for you. Here you can share your knowledge, ask questions, and engage in discussions on topics such as artificial intelligence, robotics, cloud computing, cybersecurity, and more. From the impact of technology on society to the ethical considerations of new technologies, this category covers a wide range of topics related to technology. Join the conversation and let’s explore the ever-evolving world of technology together!

Community stats

  • 7

    Monthly active users

  • 1.4K

    Posts

  • 8.5K

    Comments

Community moderators