108 points

To be fair, it is a service/website that sows discord in American society.

permalink
report
reply
8 points

Exactly. Discord isn’t a service name first, it’s a word with meaning.

People acting like discord is a made up word invented by the app.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Which is why alternative apps are definitely putting the word “discord” in their metadata to get close to Discord in search results without fear of trademark infringement.

permalink
report
parent
reply
80 points
*

I work with Google ads every day (with small businesses not shit like this)

Press the three dots at the top right and report it as being offensive. Nothing is more frustrating than being disapproved, and it’s often automated with enough clicks. Sometimes it takes a week to get someone at Google to manually unblock an ad even if it was flagged incorrectly (a eye surgeon client of mine being flagged for his ads containing alcohol sales?)

Oh also, I imagine it’ll decrease the relevancy of the ads because Google will automatically take your feedback on board and feed it into the bidding system. The more your ad is deemed irrelevant, the less strength it will have, so will either cost more, or lose rankings against their competitors. (I doubt you can spam this though, it likely has spam protection so lots of people need to do it all the time.)

permalink
report
reply
29 points

I reported their daily wire transphobia documentary ad like 4 times and still ended up getting it. They don’t care. They support it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

They support money, and showing you the ad gets google more money. This isn’t some ideological thing, they just like money. It’s not rocket science.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

The problem is that the machine is so big that there barely is a “they” anymore. It’s all automated. Support takes days to reply, and they’re all outsourced to sales teams in the Philippines.

It’s crazy I can have an ad disapproved when I didn’t even use the content they say I did, but someone reports an ad multiple times and it stays up. I imagine they have some kind of threshold where a certain percentage of the viewership needs to report it.

I’m talking about Google here, last time I used Facebook was almost a decade ago and their platform was even more of a mess and had much more creepy tracking.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

I went to do exactly this, and then realized I can’t, because I’ve never seen an ad on Google. I’ve been blocking them since I switched from AltaVista and MetaCrawler, where I also blocked ads.

Then again, I rarely use Google these days either, as the results are usually obvious or misleading.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Aha! So YOU are the reason AltaVista died!

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I was never part of their business plan.

permalink
report
parent
reply
43 points

Remember that every time you click an ad, you cost the advertiser somewhere between 10c and several dollars. And that which ads you’ve clicked on informs which ads you will get in the future. It would be a shame if somebody weaponized this knowledge and clicked ads without any actual interest in buying the products.

permalink
report
reply
17 points

have you heard of the browser extension AdNauseam? it basically does this.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

AdNauseam extension for Firefox does this

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Depends on if they pay per view or per click. And then depends on the site/app, the location of the ad, and the bid.

For the Play Store, the CPM is usually around $10-15. So for every 1,000 people who see the ad, they pay $10-15.

YouTube can be $30-40 for the video ads with some going up close to $80. An ad at the bottom of a news site can be as little as $0.50.

The ads you’ll be shown will be the highest bidder who meets the criteria to display it. In general, the more targeted it is, the higher the bid. So McDonald’s might just say, “show this ad anywhere on the site to anyone who is in the US” and bid $0.25. A high-end watch company might say “Show this at a banner ad to men who are between 30-45, have an income above $150K, who care about fine products, likely own multiple nice watches, and are visiting high end watch websites” and bid $50.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

I used to have an extension that hid ads from me, but in the background clicked on every one. I’m super annoyed that I forgot the name of it.

It made the sites I visited more money and hid the ads from me while hurting the advertisers (by costing more money) and ad networks (by screwing with the value proposition from advertising). It was great!

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Adnauseam

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Why did you stop using it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

That computer died and I’d forgotten the name.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

No. It’s an open secret kind of deal that most online advertisements don’t actually sell or do anything. In fact, a large amount of google views are bots.

How? Because there’s nothing stopping thousands of apps from using the ads incorrectly and showing them to phones or accounts or users that aren’t real people. At least with iOS, it’s very hard to run instances on servers or bot clients. Meanwhile, android can run on windows. Exploits galore.

But, no one cares. The companies are told to spend more on advertisement. The ad department of the company has a budget, they don’t care where it’s spent. So they buy ads from google and they don’t care who they get shown to 90% of the time. Everyone wins except the company but the company doesn’t care because they’re already making money.

Not to mention that the average consumer is shown thousands of ads a day. The more they see the less they notice the ads.

Basically ads are just designed to waste time for everyone. Truth social ads just lead to more installs by people already looking for their garbage app.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Companies don’t care because it’s equal for everybody. If fake views would be removed, fees per thousand clicks would just increase.

But companies wouldn’t waste money. If you offer more real viewers for the same price, companies would switch.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

Daily reminder that the F-Droid store exists and has ad and tracking free apps.

permalink
report
reply
35 points
*

People said I was crazy for pointing out that google actively sides with the extremely far right but at least now people are starting to see it.

permalink
report
reply
23 points
*

Dude, mine promotes an app for finding friends.

Google is suggesting this because of OPs history. Calm your tits.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Mines a chat app for singles hahaha

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Google is pushing relationships on you! /s

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Hahahahah

Cries

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

Out of curiosity, are you Canadian, or just on the Canadian instance? I ask because if memory serves the search results tend to be a combination of search history (if you have personalized ads enabled, you can opt out of them), country/region, and general subject/topic (so in this case social apps), probably among other details.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points
*

That’s pretty funny. I don’t think that app is going to help you if this is how you treat people.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Don’t need it, thanks.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

I believe it. The algorithm keeps pushing far right videos to my feed despite Google knowing damn well that I can’t stand Republicans. Not to mention that it likes to show left wing media to the far right, so that they can dislike it and brigade the comments. Yet when a Fox News video is posted, nothing but likes and praise in the comments. If you didn’t know any better it could lead you to believe that 90% of Americans are MAGA Republicans.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

I buy $2 sale priced ebooks from the play store occasionally and I’ve had a couple dozen hard right trash tracts from folks like Jordan Peterson dropped into my “Books for You” recommendations. The best part is that you can’t flag them as “not interested” from the play store, you have to open a separate app (Play Books), navigate to the same feed, find the book and then you can tell the algorithm to get that shit out of your face.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

I would consider myself pretty leftist, but I still occasionally get stuff like that, too. The only thing I can think of is that I am into fishing and the fishing demographic skews towards viewing right-wing content, I imagine. Maybe you have some other interest that aligns with people who watch right wing related stuff somewhere somehow?

I don’t think it’s a conspiracy, if anything it’s got to be a hiccup in the YouTube content algorithm somewhere.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I mean not really, unless cars and computers are a right wing thing now.

The most conservative thing I do is own guns, but only out of necessity and not because I like them. I literally never watch videos about them so IDK.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

More likely it’s a combination of his previous search history and how much Truth Social is paying for ad space.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Stop thinking in binary.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

That’s a new way of dogwhistling “lets have some nuance here”

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

It’s actually really sad you see the world this way. I hope you can eventually come to appreciate the imperfect and nuanced world we live in.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Politics

!politics@lemmy.ml

Create post

Discuss world politics here.

Rules

  • Be civil and respectful

  • No NSFW content

  • No blatantly fake news or unfounded conspiracy theories

  • No heavily sensationalized articles

Community icon by Webalys, licensed under CC BY 3.0.

Community stats

  • 2.6K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.2K

    Posts

  • 8.2K

    Comments