New York appeals court judge on Friday rejected Donald Trump’s attempt to stop the ongoing $250 million civil fraud trial, but temporarily halted the process of breaking up the former president’s businesses.

Associate Justice Peter Moulton issued the ruling after a brief hearing Friday afternoon. It leaves Trump’s empire untouched for at least another month and perhaps offers the former president and his family a glimmer of hope.

Trump sought to put Judge Arthur Engoron’s surprise summary judgment order last week that he is liable for fraud and must cancel business certificates for many of his business entities on hold pending further appeal.

76 points

During the hearing, Moulton speculated that such a broad interpretation of Engoron’s ruling could mean LLCs holding the private homes of Trump and the other defendants could be at risk of being sold.

So fucking what? If they were used to enrich a criminal enterprise then they should be auctioned off.

permalink
report
reply
17 points

100%

The homestead exemption protects people from being forced to sell their home to satisfy a debt (in many states it also exempts a portion of the home’s value from property taxes), but if an LLC owns it and they don’t, those same protections don’t apply. If, instead of Trump putting his home in his own name, he assigned it to an LLC, he did so to get some sort of a benefit. Potentially losing his home is the cost he of that decision.

Caveat: if the LLC was renting the property to Trump and they had an explicit lease with a definite term, then some protections might apply.

Sources:

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

One interesting twist that I’ve heard is that Trump put his naming rights in the LLC also. It’s possible that the rights to the Trump name get sold to some bidder.

If so, who wants to get together and buy the rights? I’m thinking we can make Trump Brand Liberal Trading cards (celebrating liberal icons who made great strides in civil rights, worker protections, etc). Then there could be Trump Brand Clothing - designed for LGBTQ people. And so on. With 0% of proceeds going to Donald What’s-His-Name. I imagine right wing heads would explode from having to oppose Trump branded items.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Friendly reminder that Trump living at MAL is a violation of his property deed

permalink
report
parent
reply
68 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
16 points

That makes sense

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It was also because, if Trump wins on appeal (unlikely), you can’t reverse the business being sold off. Pausing the actual sell off until after the case and appeal was pretty rational. Once he loses his appeal, then all his businesses and buildings go bye bye.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Wow imagine suffering consequences to your actions like 99% of America.

permalink
report
reply
5 points

Doesn’t this just give Trump extra time to hold a fire sale? Like, if he knows that in a month he’s going to lose everything, what’s preventing him from just liquidating it all and just shoving it all into offshore accounts?

permalink
report
reply
3 points

No because a retired judge, Barbara Jones, has been put in control of the whole Trump organisation and every financial act has to go through her.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Huge paper trail and would be a fast way to jail. Even for Trump. As much as he has influence, it is hard to hide money like that. Also he has assets throughout the US. Is he going to sell it all and put it into offshore accounts. Because if he illegally sends New York assets away, they will go for anything he holds.

Secondly do people here really think money is useful on its own? To have the lifestyle in the US or abroad, having all those funds locked into some offshore bank is rather useless. Unless he wants to move to said location. Certainly would not be conductive to his jet setting lifestyle he so wants to portray.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 480K

    Comments