119 points

I like how they quickly glance over the fact that you need line of sight to connect and call that a good thing because people behind a wall cant steal your data.

permalink
report
reply
29 points
*

Within the same room, it is possible to use a frequency of light that will reflect off of almost anything. I just got a window AC unit with a remote that defies physics. Like I can have a desk, and closed plantation shutters (slats and doors) in front of the receiver on the front of the unit, point the remote anywhere in the wrong direction and still activate the thing. It’s just an IR LED transmitter setup. I’ve never seen one that is quite this powerful. It is uber cheapo general electric bottom of the consumer grade junk category too.

This is the NSA’s wet dream tech. Anyone with line of sight could intercept the data stream.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Imagine trying to communicate with your squad but the NSA has a mirror up inbetween the relays

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

For low datarates sure, but at high speeds the dispersion caused by light taking multiple paths will be unacceptable. The reason single node fiber is so thin is to make sure light can only travel along one path. If you want multi gigabit speeds, you will need a direct line of sight.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

I put my smart IR blaster behind my tv and it still works. It can even reaches the AC unit in my room if the door is open.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I have a remote for a TV that does the same thing. Can point any direction and it works.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Because it works through Blutooth.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

That’s a feature!

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

It absolutely is a good thing when security is concerned. WiFi is easy to snoop even if you’re not physically in the room, if you know what you’re doing. Sure there are encryption standards that are very good to tamp down on this. However, what’s even better with LiFi is you must be physically in the room to intercept any transmissions that are being sent.

This is by design one of the largest advantages to LiFi. There are other practical uses as well, but it’s not like LiFi is designed to explicitly replace WiFi.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I could easily imagine having both this and traditional wifi on a device, so that it can fall back to radio frequencies if higher frequency light fails it. Wifi is super cheap these days.

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

Ma! Theres dust on the Li-Fi sensor again! Ma! You gotta clean it every week for the TV to work!

Yeah this is gonna be great.

permalink
report
reply
11 points

Apple Cloth will sell like hot cake

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

It’s going to be great if you don’t imagine it as a one-for-one replacement for traditional wifi and use it in applications that are specific to its strengths and weaknesses.

Also, just how dusty is your house that one week’s accumulation is enough to snuff out a signal?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I’m making a joke about the article headline. It paints a picture to that it will replace traditional wifi when that is definitely not the case.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

“Advantages of using light rather than radio frequencies”

Nobody tell em how the electromagnetic spectrum works!

permalink
report
reply
5 points

Yup, as someone who worked with radar, I’m not really sure what they’re trying to say.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

the key technical difference being that Wi-Fi uses radio frequency to induce an electric tension in an antenna to transmit data, whereas Li-Fi uses the modulation of light intensity to transmit data.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

It’s been like 5 years since the last time I heard about the technology

permalink
report
reply
11 points

It is 5 years away from being 5 years away

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I’m pretty sure I heard about this in high school, over 10 years ago…

Looked it up, and it was first announced in 2011.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

time for a new round of funding - it’s only 5 years away!

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Is this expected to be a niche technology, or is it something that regular people will use? Seems like it would be a hassle to make sure that your li-fi receivers are within line of sight of your li-fi transmitters or whatever.

permalink
report
reply
10 points

I could imagine it being installed on ceilings within certain rooms. Devices could be connected to both lifi and wifi. If lifi isn’t working it could fall back to wifi. But in reality, I have a feeling this will just be in niche scenarios, yes. I can imagine wifi getting 100x faster before this catches on.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Also, need repeater to reach certain room in the corner? Just strategically place some mirrors and you’re golden!

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

They don’t even need to look like mirrors to the human eye since this uses infrared.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

One in the ceiling of every room you want coverage in would be fine. Enterprise grade ones in stores.

More importantly, though, it is more secure and higher performing. Could see the government using this for wireless SIPR rooms. They won’t until the tech is tested and refined first though.

Let the hobby community do that part and the regular consumer will see something very usable in a few years.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.ml

Create post

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

Community stats

  • 3.2K

    Monthly active users

  • 2.9K

    Posts

  • 45K

    Comments

Community moderators