Fixed games not loading on betsoft.com

How nice of Mozilla to also think of the casino games

permalink
report
reply
31 points

If someone is wondering the change is not so site specific, but the bug report makes it look so. It’s a media play fix.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Yeah looks like the ogg vorbis files the site uses just have bad data in one field, and an older version of firefox was able to play them anyway, so they added back the special case.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points
*

Wouldn’t that be nice, for a major corporation to denounce and actively deny a platform for a predatory industry that exists solely to take advantage of people’s addiction. I’d respect that

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

Super anti-gambling industry but I don’t want my browser blocking me off from sites by default.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

once a browser starts choosing to block sites for you as some stand in moral compass, things can only go downhill from there

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

I think that would be nice but I think it would also raise a lot of eyebrows if Mozilla unilaterally decided to parental control your access to the Internet. It’s governance that’s the issue. Consider this https://www.cnn.com/2018/05/14/politics/sports-betting-ncaa-supreme-court/index.html

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

I get that ending the “prohibition” on gambling is good optics for the economy, it’s like legalizing pot. All the shady aspects of the industry are nearly eliminated, and assures a standard of quality.
I guess I view gambling differently cuz… with pot or alcohol, you at least know what you’re going to get. And when working through addiction, its a lot more tangible of a thing to deal with.

With gambling, you’re pouring money into something you’re not even guaranteed to get at all.
And for some reason, Alberta loves to push gambling advertising really heavily.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

I get what you’re saying, and agree that the gambling industry is predatory on its face, but isn’t the preference for Firefox over Chromium(amongst tech people on the fediverse) largely driven by the idea that the web should be an open platform with open standards that renders and functions the same on different rendering engines?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

True, sticking with foss morals definitely widens appeal and encourages firefoxes growth overall.
I just thought it odd to accommodate for a service/industry that could completely care less, and isn’t generally something I thought the open source community would be interested in in the first place?

Maybe i’m wrong

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

They’ll just go to edge or chrome to get their fix. We already have the rising Y’all Queda to be the morality police, we don’t need Firefox copying that mentality

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Wake me when it’s more than a bugfix release.

Not EVERYTHING needs an announcement

permalink
report
reply
6 points

Bug fix releases are the best releases

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Should just have [Major] and [Minor] in the post title imo

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I fuckin luv Firefox, bros.

permalink
report
reply
4 points

Waiting on the fake reviews detector feature

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply

Firefox

!firefox@lemmy.ml

Create post

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

Community stats

  • 1.7K

    Monthly active users

  • 936

    Posts

  • 17K

    Comments

Community moderators