Among the many changes, the new rules would require batteries in consumer devices like smartphones to be easily removable and replaceable. That’s far from the case today…

9 points

User choice is always good, but for me, I prefer the water resistance rather than a swappable battery.

permalink
report
reply
6 points

Can’t say I have ever needed the water resistance, but I also never drop my phone, so I guess I’m in the minority.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

the old razer flip phones were horrible. I went through four of the things in the course of a year because they got so much of a whiff of water they’d crap out. the last time, it was left in the truck while I was fishing and the humidity killed it.

Another model… got done in at a pool, it was left on a table and kids happened.

it’s not that people are klutzes and drop their phones. It’s that shit happens. Yeah, it was a trade off, but, sealing it against stuff… is a lot easier when it’s sealed

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Yeah, if you keep a phone for 5-6 years, you usually only have to change the battery once. I reckon the dust hasn’t settled on this though - I think there will be compromise where battery replacements are cheaper, but still need to be done by a professional

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I think we can have a law that says if a device does not have resistance against water submersion, it must have replaceable batteries.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

You can have a swappable battery and water resistance. Samsung galaxy s5 had a removable plastic cover and IP67 water resistance, so if the manufacturers tried they could easily have them both.
Also, if you do any repairs on a new phone you lose water resistance (unless you replace the silicone), while on the s5 you could just replace the battery and would just need to press the cover back on. After the repair the phone would still be water resistant, unlike the new phones with glass backs.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

The only weakness with the S5 was the charging port having a cover that could easily break off, but modern ports these days are waterproofed, so they could just make one of those.

Personally, if they remade the S5, with a modern board and charging port (rather than the Micro-USB 3.0 monstrosity), I’d be very tempted to buy it. The IR blaster and everything else was just nice to have.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I had some use for the IR blaster, it’s a damn shame the technology is no longer here. Audio jacks too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I don’t need swappable batteries because they wear out. I need them cuz I’m ADD and constantly forget to charge my phone. Having a spare fully charged battery when I have to head to work on my 60-90 minute commute is invaluable.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I too take a shower every day with my phone in it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

I prefer non swappable phone batteries. If I need to charge my phone while out I use USB power bank, which is infinitely more useful than a naked phone battery that can only be used in the phone. Non swappable batteries also allow for phone casing to be much more resilient to impacts and the elements, and can help reduce the phones size.

A phone battery is not to going to reach end of life for 2-3 years in normal use, so it doesn’t seem too much of hardship to get the toolbox out or go to a service centre when it does eventually need replacing.

Maybe require manufactures to not use such incredibly strong glues that some use to secure the batteries, but mandating they be swappable seems the wrong approach to me.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Have you thought about having both? It shouldn’t be that hard to make

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Interesting.

I remember struggling to find a phone with replaceable battery. The galaxy S3 was good because of this. “We can’t make the battery replaceable, otherwise the phone won’t be waterproof”, yeah that was bullshit.

This will make the phone more expensive and this is totally fine and expected.

permalink
report
reply
4 points

Oh gawd yes. I love the EU.

permalink
report
reply
1 point
*

Lmao no this is shit. Say goodbye to durability as well as any water resistance while making phones bulkier to boot. You can already swap the battery on most non-fruit-branded phones while maintaining water resistance if you do it right (actually it would “reup” the water resistance if anything due to fresh adhesive, again assuming it’s done right).

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

There’s no reason you HAVE to sacrifice durability and water resistance. It’d just cost a tiny bit more in materials, which I’m perfectly fine with given how much this would save the environment.

You can already swap the battery on most non-fruit-branded phones while maintaining water resistance if you do it right.

? How do you swap batteries on most phones nowadays in 5 seconds?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

How do you swap batteries on most phones nowadays in 5 seconds?

Where did I say anything about swapping the battery in 5 seconds? So if it takes longer than 5 seconds it doesn’t count?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

They found out how to waterproof walkmans with replaceable batteries and cds. Pretty sure they can figure out phones.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Yeah it’s definitely possible. I remember my waterproof Walkman.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Source? Or, or more specifically, model numbers of these waterpoof walkmans?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Screw the environment. I demand convenience instead!

The level of entitlement people have nowadays is insane, especially regarding issues that they are happy to say are super important. They just refuse to give up an iota of cenvenience to do anything about it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Pssst, the environment isn’t affected at least as far as Android phones are concerned as they allow battery swapping. I’ve swapped the batteries myself personally in my Nexus 4, 5, 6p, Pixel XL, Pixel 3 XL, and Pixel 4 XL. It’s not that hard. You’re allowing yourself to support bullshit with the virtue signal of muh environment which works out really well! Just look at Germany! Oh, right…

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

Finally. So tired of having to replace a phone simply because the battery no longer lasts a day, while the rest of it is still functional.

permalink
report
reply
2 points
*

You can just replace the batteries in most phones for $100 or so. No need to buy another $500-$1000 phone.

You may or may not lose water resistance, but im sure you can live with that vs having to buy another one.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

As someone who tends to hang onto my phone for ages, I like being able to get replacement batteries… but I wish they would just take everything fairphone does (removable battery + lineage + and especially right-to-repair stuff) and base new standards on that.

OTOH, I also believe that would not be impossible to engineer a phone that could be taken apart where you could have replacement parts for both the battery and seals (e.g. while many companies currently frame things as “removable batteries OR water resistance”, I see no technology reasons why BOTH couldn’t exist in the same device) … There just hasn’t been a big push for businesses to develop something like that bc everyone buys their products without them needing to put that much effort into it.

If companies stopped auto-voiding warranties over users opening a phone and stopped treating everyone as incapable of doing their own repairs, I could totally see user-replaceable seals being a thing. You can basically look at other markets that do have right-to-repair. Sure, replacing seals on a phone might be a bit much for grandma. But grandma is also probably going to call either a repair shop or someone in the family who is good with it. Really not much different than upgrading laptop ram/hdd or doing your own plumbing or changing the oil on a car today… pretty damn easy if you know what you’re doing, but not something everyone is going to know how to or want to do.

permalink
report
reply
1 point

When Samsung and Apple are seemingly incapable of producing repairable devices while Fairphone comes out of nowhere and are doing it just fine, it’s not a question of it being difficult. It’s a question of it being profitable. If Fairphone managed to make a repairable device, Apple or Samsung would have managed to create one that is both fully waterproof and repairable if they considered it a priority.

From the view of the industry, the logic is that “if you’re not going to have your phone break down in heavy rain, at least make sure you’ll have to replace it in three years because the battery starts sucking”. There’s absolutely no incentive to make a product that will actually last.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

If people were buying the Fairphone there would be lots of incentive. But people just like to talk about how they care about the environment, human rights, etc. And then go buy the new iPhone.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!tech@kbin.social

Create post

This magazine is dedicated to discussions on the latest developments, trends, and innovations in the world of technology. Whether you are a tech enthusiast, a developer, or simply curious about the latest gadgets and software, this is the place for you. Here you can share your knowledge, ask questions, and engage in discussions on topics such as artificial intelligence, robotics, cloud computing, cybersecurity, and more. From the impact of technology on society to the ethical considerations of new technologies, this category covers a wide range of topics related to technology. Join the conversation and let’s explore the ever-evolving world of technology together!

Community stats

  • 7

    Monthly active users

  • 1.4K

    Posts

  • 8.5K

    Comments

Community moderators