Fatah (Arabic: فتح, Fatḥ), formerly the Palestinian National Liberation Movement, is a Palestinian nationalist and social democratic political party. It is the largest faction of the confederated multi-party Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) and the second-largest party in the Palestinian Legislative Council (PLC). Mahmoud Abbas, the President of the Palestinian Authority, is the chairman of Fatah.
Fatah is generally considered to have had a strong involvement in revolutionary struggle in the past and has maintained a number of militant groups. Fatah had been closely identified with the leadership of its founder and chairman, Yasser Arafat, until his death in 2004, when Farouk Kaddoumi constitutionally succeeded him to the position of Fatah Chairman and continued in the position until 2009, when Abbas was elected chairman. Since Arafat’s death, factionalism within the ideologically diverse movement has become more apparent.
In the 2006 election for the PLC, the party lost its majority in the PLC to Hamas. The Hamas legislative victory led to a conflict between Fatah and Hamas, with Fatah retaining control of the Palestinian National Authority in the West Bank through its president. Fatah is also active in the control of Palestinian refugee camps.
Founding
The core group of Fatah was most likely founded in Kuwait in autumn 1957 by five or six Palestinians, among them Yasir Arafat and Khalil al-Wazir. This core group agreed on the movement’s name, drafted its manifesto, and planned its “Revolutionary Organizational Structure.”
The name Fatah, the Arabic acronym in reverse for Harakat al-tahrir al-watani al-Filastini (The Palestinian National Liberation Movement), came to attention in the first issue of the magazine Filastinuna–nida’ al-hayat (Our Palestine–The Call of Life), in Beirut in October 1959, and cells of the group began to be formed in the Gaza Strip, Jordan, Egypt, Syria, Lebanon, Kuwait, Qatar, and Saudi Arabia.
As a movement of refugees, Fatah needed support from the Arab world, which it initially found in Algeria starting in 1962, then in Syria starting from 1963. Relying on this support, the movement leadership began preparations to set up a clandestine military wing named al-ʿAsifa (storm).
In July 1968, during its second conference held in the Syrian town of Zabadani (the first conference took place in Damascus in Summer 1964), Fatah finalized its organizational structure. Its composition was based on two decision-making committees that constituted its leadership: the Central Committee, which included ten members who represented the movement’s senior leadership, and the broader Revolutionary Council, considered an intermediary body between the Central Committee and the party’s general membership.
Guiding Principles
Fatah was the first national liberation movement since 1948 to be started by Palestinians themselves and that brought together Palestinian activists from different ideological and intellectual backgrounds. It called on all politically active Palestinians to abandon their party affiliations and to be united under its banner as a movement to “organize a vanguard that would rise above factionalism, whims and leanings to include the entire people.”
The movement’s leadership saw armed struggle as its primary means of liberating Palestine. It modeled itself after the revolutionary struggles in Algeria, Cuba, and Vietnam.
Megathreads and spaces to hang out:
- ❤️ Come listen to music and Watch movies with your fellow Hexbears nerd, in Cy.tube
- 💖 Come talk in the New Weekly Queer thread
- 💛 Read and talk about a current topics in the News Megathread
- 💚 Come and talk in the Daily Bloomer Thread
- ⭐️ September Movie Nominations ⭐️
reminders:
- 💚 You nerds can join specific comms to see posts about all sorts of topics
- 💙 Hexbear’s algorithm prioritizes comments over upbears
- 💜 Sorting by new you nerd
- 🌈 If you ever want to make your own megathread, you can reserve a spot here nerd
- 🐶 Join the unofficial Hexbear-adjacent Mastodon instance toots.matapacos.dog
Links To Resources (Aid and Theory):
Aid:
Theory:
Trapped in an endless hell of fight or flight when the centralized metaphor my lecturer is using in his lecture about the immune system is of a military defending a country.
It’s a little bit like that. It’s a coordinated group of specialized units working towards the goal of destroying foreign organisms and abnormal host cells. It even subjugates commensal foreigners that might give rise to opportunistic disease. If I might offer that there’s likely more to the immune system than is immediately useful for conventional medical purposes. You need to think like that for the philosophy that drives medicine as we know it.
In the natural scientific understanding of the immune system, I don’t think we quite grasp our place in it all. We don’t know what all that non-coding part of our genome does because sometimes it makes @RNAi@hexbear.net that has (nacently understood) functions in the body. Sometimes commensal bacteria fights for space with horrible bacteria. Bacteria signal to the brain. In gorillas and cows, bacteria help digest cellulose in leaves and grass. Fecal transplants are a way of restoring microbe balance and there and cure diseases like (I think) IBS. The immune system may not be as it seems.
I just struggle in particular with the metaphorical approach where the cells are literal little guys who go to military school and they have thoughts and dreams and when they feel like shit they call for help and their friends kill them.
Whenever the lecturer goes into like what actually is going on even on just a simplified level, it sticks much harder than some metaphor about kindergardners and their teacher and stuff like that.
it is october 13 and stalin saved the world from fascism
I too struggle with Wombat’s daily assertion. What I have decided is that Stalin saved the world from fascism but didn’t eliminate the risk of future fascism. If someone gives you the Heimlich that doesn’t mean you’ll never choke again.
Deleted my previous comment about this because the source was maybe sketchy, but holy shit this is beyond evil.
Can any palestinians or other arabs here give a take on non-arabs wearing a kufiya? i think they look very nice and i’d like to show my support for palestine, but im not sure where this particular item falls on the scale of “showing solidarity” to “cultural appropriation”. i know some traditional clothing items are meaningful in such a way that it becomes disrespectful for cultural outsiders to wear them but i don’t know about this one. thanks and stay safe wherever you are
