Imagine there’s a sequence of items, it started somewhere in the past and will keep on going. The kind of items could be anything – say days, or football matches, or lectures, or widgets out of an assembly line.

I’d like to refer to the future item that will be, say, the 100th if I start counting them from now. I hope you understand what I mean: the 1st would be the next, the 2nd would be the one after the next, and so on.

How do I denote that future 100th item with a concise expression? I thought of “the next 100th item”, but it doesn’t sound right.

The problem is that if I just say “the 100th item”, that refers to the number 100 since the sequence started, not the number 100 starting counting from now.

Example:

The last 10 widgets were red and blue; the 20th widget from now will be yellow.

Saying “the 20th widget from now” doesn’t sound right – but maybe it is? Nor does “the next 20th widget” sound right.

As usual, if possible please also give some references. Cheers!

5 points

There’s not a specific name for it in the way you’re thinking. If you’re looking at object A, then object B is next. One could say that object C is “the one after that,” but it’s also just as common to say third. Anything larger than two (for this one and next) gets unwieldy and English just uses the number. It wouldn’t be the next 100th, simply the 100th. Spoken aloud, the “one” is dropped and it’s said as “the hundredth.” Usually, that is. You wouldn’t be incorrect in adding “the” because English likes to make up its own rules.

permalink
report
reply
1 point
*

Thank you. My problem is differentiating the “coming” 100th from the “past” 100th. But I realize my post in unclear about that, I’ll edit it now!

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

It depends how you’re counting I think. If you’re just counting things, you would normally just say the number, “the 100th widget” or “the 100th day”. No need for any other descriptor. But if you’re counting things relative to time, I would say “100 widgets later” or “100 days later.” Next is very specific since it refers to only the thing directly after the current one, so it isn’t really used for high amounts of things.

I don’t have a reference since this was never directly taught in any of the schools I went to. This is just how I’ve always heard other people say it.

permalink
report
reply
1 point

Thank you. The problem with “the 100th widget” is that it would refer to the 100th since the sequence started, but I’d like to refer the the 100th if I were to start counting now. “100 widgets later” is an adverb rather than an adjective, but maybe I can build a sentence around it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

You can just say “the 100th from now”

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Thank you for confirming that! I was very unsure.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

@BD1sHappyFeet@lemm.ee @memmypemmy@lemm.ee I’ve added some clarification and an example.

permalink
report
parent
reply

English usage and grammar

!english@lemmy.ca

Create post

A community to discuss and ask questions about English usage and grammar.

If your post refers to a specific English variant, please indicate it within square brackets (for instance [Canadian]).

Online resources:

Sibling communities:

Rules of conduct:

The usual ones on Lemmy and Mastodon.. In short: be kind or at least respectful, no offensive language, no harassment, no spam.

(Icon: entry “English” in the Oxford English Dictionary, 1933. Banner: page from Chaucer’s “The Wife of Bath’s Tale”.)

Community stats

  • 86

    Monthly active users

  • 33

    Posts

  • 330

    Comments