A new poll shows President Joe Biden leading Trump 44% to 37%, with Kennedy notching 16%.

Released by Marist in partnership with NPR and PBS Newshour on Tuesday, the poll shows a five-point drop among Democrats for Biden with Kennedy in the race. Meanwhile, the survey indicates a 10-point drop among Republicans for Trump with RFK Jr. on the ticket.

68 points

Again, national polls are meaningless since we don’t run national elections.

permalink
report
reply
48 points

They give a general idea of how the public will vote when it comes to spoiler candidates. No, they don’t consider regional differences, but I wouldn’t say they are meaningless.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-9 points

Not saying polls don’t have their worth, but you can make polls say basically whatever you want.

“poll of 2,000 people of varying ages, genders, backgrounds” when they stood out in front of a music theater to get opinions on modern rap music. The results are biased because of how they collected them. Yeah, technically everyone coming out of that theater fits your “different ages sexes” and so on, but they’re all going to have strong opinions based on why they have gathered in common interest.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

That is not how Marist works. I showed their methodology in another comment.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

gotta block this user. someone this uninformed about things has no business ever being in front of my eyes again.

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

That’s not how polling works.

Small sample size national polls are always the first line of polling.

They are not meaningless, even if they don’t have the same precision as exit polling.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

What I mean is, thanks to the electoral college, running a national poll as though it means anything is pointless.

We saw this in 2016 with Clinton. National polling showed her winning, and as far as the popular vote was concerned, she won.

Which means jack all in the electoral college.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points
*

I understand that, but you are just too black and white.

There is a middle ground of indicative truth between being 100% precise or totally wrong.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

Seems to me that your mistake is that you believe the purpose of polls is to predict an outcome, and/or tell you who is “winning” or “losing” at a given point in time. That is not their purpose.

Their purpose is to gauge the relative effectiveness of different campaign messaging strategies, and to give a rough order of magnitude of a campaign’s trajectory.

Here’s the most important part: polls contain no actionable data for voters. They shouldn’t influence whether or how much you volunteer or donate, and they absolutely must not influence how you vote.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

Polling showed Clinton as being most likely to win. The fact that she didn’t win doesn’t mean the polling is necessarily meaningless. Even if someone has a 90% chance of winning, it means they can not only lose, but 1 in 10 times you expect them to lose.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

They seem pretty meaningless to me, they’ve been way off the last couple elections.

Who is actually being polled, and how? I know damn well that neither myself nor anybody I personally know has been polled.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

So true! Also, even if this data is 100% accurate, that means 16% of people prefer him to Trump (or Biden). But come election day, the one thing Republicans can be counted on to do is to check the box next to the ‘R’ candidate, no matter what.

It will be interesting to see what effect he has on turnout, if any…

permalink
report
parent
reply
63 points

“I refuse to believe this poll because PBS and NPR are secretly controlled by the Tri-lateral commission, the Pro Bowlers Tour and Baskin-Robbins. Do your own research!”

  • RFK “I am not a crackpot!” Jr.
permalink
report
reply
21 points

Also, dippin’ dots is NOT the ice cream of the future! (This needs to come back, it was wonderful)

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Dippin dots almost went away for good! lucky for them, the plant-based meat substitute industry needed a way to get little drops of fatty stuff cooled down so it could be easily mixed, like fat is distributed through hamburger.

And wouldn’t you know it, Dippin Dots had a crazy idea…

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Here I was thinking it was the COVID vaccine storage consulting they did

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Really dude? Baskin Robbins? We all know the world is run by the DQ cabal. There’s really no other way to explain how they’re still in business in spite of their absolutely revolting food

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

People eat their food? The one and only thing I ever buy there is a dipped vanilla soft serve cone (butterscotch if they have it, cherry if they don’t). They do that right!

permalink
report
parent
reply
55 points

There is no way this jaggoff is polling at 16%.

permalink
report
reply
6 points

16% is basically frustration with the other choices available. It’s not the percentage that would actually vote for him if an election were held tomorrow. It is a bit high considering how awful RFK is, but it just shows how incredibly unpopular the other options are.

permalink
report
parent
reply
47 points

Well duh, he’s a Qanon freak

permalink
report
reply
41 points

They were banking on Democrats seeing “Kennedy” and blindly pulling that lever.

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

A certain Louisiana Kennedy comes to mind.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

the survey indicates a 10-point drop among Republicans for Trump with RFK Jr. on the ticket.

A 10-point swing on the 2020 results would give Biden Florida, Ohio, Texas, Iowa, and North Carolina.

permalink
report
reply
24 points

A million bucks says RFK J. drops out for a spot on trumps cabinet

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I’m done making bets on anything about Trump’s actions. He’s way too chaotic and high on his own supply. There’s just no way to predict his actions. He very well might think he can take on RFK and that all the polls are wrong.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Let me ask my WOMAN about OMAN

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Trump’s cabinet Trump’s jailhouse gang

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

I really hope that they get completely crushed in the election. The strongest message possible has to be sent. One where they can’t claim the election was stolen or any bullshit excuse (of course they will still try).

This has to be the end of trump and his cronies or it’s going to be the end of us as a nation. There’s no middle ground at all.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

A solitary vote should, in theory, be enough. I agree with hoping for a strong message, however we shouldn’t normalize cheating in elections. We should combat it by shoring up the election process and system not either side winning by bigger margins.

However, a profound defeat may make it more obvious to those in the future that not rooting out problems early leads to long term losses not gains. Make fair elections to be in their interest.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 481K

    Comments