138 points

I legitimately can’t imagine how awful it must be to be trans in Russia. Well, pretty much anywhere really, now that I think of it. Trans people just can’t catch a break. I feel so bad for them.

permalink
report
reply
29 points

I imagine this is why many people that might consider it just dont. It’s easier sometimes to just do the expected things at the expense of one’s self.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

True, but there are definitely places where it’s much better to be trans than others, and Russia’s near the bottom of the pack.

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points

Russia is a tough place to be human

permalink
report
parent
reply
-15 points

Unless you are a white straight russian man

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

You and me both, fam. I can’t even imagine how it must be for a trans person to live in the US south - it is just mind-baffling to think of what it must be in other countries that barely even recognize any of those rights or are even outright hostile to the identity.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points
*

I can’t speak for every trans person in the South, but for me, it’s pretty fucking awful.

Part of it is my area(lot of old white conservatives). They really don’t give a fuck. I have had to listen to 10 minute rants about gender politics because they want a pink gender reveal cake.

We did multiple cake variations for Valentine’s. All stick figures. We “dared” to put rainbows on a couple of them. We had to get rid of them because people complained about STICK FIGURES under rainbows.

I have to make sure I’m in a safe place to even begin feeling like myself.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Like you said, I think it’s pretty awful in the majority of countries with few exceptions

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Here in Ontario is pretty good for me as a trans person, well at least in terms of my being trans. I feel fortunate.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

I’m glad you feel comfortable in Ontario. I hope we can keep it that way here.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

I have no idea what it’s like to have gender dysphoria, but I’d imagine they’d just not come out. But idk how that works, or if they’re willing to get bullied by like every Russian ever.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

For the record, I tried not coming out for about 25 years and it wrecked my mental health and increased my depression. :(

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

It can affect everyone differently but not coming out and getting things done can lead to terrible mental health and depression, leading to suicide. Transitionning is the only way we know to supress those symptoms.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

That isn’t entirely true. Transitioning is very recent idea. Being trans and transitioning is also intimately tied to pharma capital complex.

There were many ways of being queer and trans which have been erased over time. Simply consider the native American stuff and also Indian motions of hijra.

Though not this precise point a good text to read : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Testo_Junkie

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I really hope some countries will provide asylum, but I doubt that

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

most of russian people doesn’t support lgbt whatsoever

and it’s prohibited by law to promote lgbt

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Unfortunately they’re right though. The majority of the population is.

The fact that it’s prohibited by law certainly contributes to that though, and actively preventing any attempt to change it is politically popular.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

At the very best that’s an “all lives matter” kind of comment. But if you’re implying that being trans is mental illness, FO.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

It’s pretty damn great where I am, where I have access to medical and mental care. Just sucks that some think they know what to do with us better than we do.

permalink
report
parent
reply
67 points

So this is next step for american republicans?

permalink
report
reply
22 points

Technically yes. Previous laws were also drafted with the help of some republican-adjacent organizations, not to mention that CitizenGo, the dhristofascist org that pushed the Ugandan gay genocide law, is being bankrolled by both Russian and US far-right adjacent oligarchs. Any free country that does not consider CitizenGo a threat to safety, liberty, and secularism, are committing suicide.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

You mean the previous step? It seems to be what they’re working on now

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Have they actually got something in the pipeline.

Tough fucking luck. If healthcare is private in the US, it’s none of their business, the state doesn’t get a say.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Just like they have no say over abortion, right? They won’t be held back by principles.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

The global RW fascist insurgency are tied at the hip with moscovia

permalink
report
parent
reply
-17 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points
*

This reminds me how during the later stages of WW2, while the Nazis were losing the war, they kept spending resources on the Holocaust.

permalink
report
reply
3 points

The scary thing is that it actually wasn’t a lot of resources. Most genocides in history have happened in places that aren’t industrialized. In those cases, yeah it did take a significant amount of resources and involves a lot of people.

For an an industrialized country, genocide on the scale the Nazis did is actually a tiny percentage of the resources available. Think about how many people you can put in just one train. Even if that train runs just a few times a day, well… there’s some extremely dark mathematics about it.

The politics of hate is so incredibly dangerous in an industrialized country. Industrialized genocide can kill millions without impacting other priorities.

Scary to think about.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-33 points

Why are the so many people on this site white washing Nazis? It seems so concetrated here.

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

I’m very curious about what it is that you think the word “whitewash” means.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

I googled it after reading your comment cause I realized I didn’t actually know what it meant.

There were a few definitions but I’m guessing this is the one the person you’re replying to meant:

“deliberately attempt to conceal unpleasant or incriminating facts about (someone or something).”

Idk why they thought someone calling out Nazis for spending resources on the Holocaust up until the very end meant that people are whitewashing Nazis though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-11 points

Making something seem not-as-bad. Nazis literally genocided 11 million people. Russia is being awful about medical care. Theres an ocean of difference.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Sorry, what? Are you saying that this comment about the holocaust makes the Nazis look… better?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-9 points

More like equating the holocaust to bad medical care is trying to make the holocaust look better. Im exergeratting of course, but im hate when people call everything nazi.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

You’re whitewashing Putin’s regime right now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-49 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
74 points
*

It’s not. It’s a completely historical comparison. Delusional is pretending like the very clear repeat of history isn’t happening because the idea of modern Nazis makes you uncomfortable.

"Adolf Hitler was named chancellor on January 30, 1933, and enacted policies to rid Germany of Lebensunwertes Leben, or “lives unworthy of living.” What began as a sterilization program ultimately led to the extermination of millions of Jews, Roma, Soviet and Polish citizens—and homosexuals and transgender people.

When the Nazis came for the [Institute for Sexual Research] on May 6, 1933, Hirschfeld was out of the country. Giese fled with what little he could. Troops swarmed the building, carrying off a bronze bust of Hirschfeld and all his precious books, which they piled in the street. Soon a towerlike bonfire engulfed more than 20,000 books, some of them rare copies that had helped provide a historiography for nonconforming people.

The carnage flickered over German newsreels. It was among the first and largest of the Nazi book burnings. Nazi youth, students and soldiers participated in the destruction, while voiceovers of the footage declared that the German state had committed “the intellectual garbage of the past” to the flames. The collection was irreplaceable."

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-forgotten-history-of-the-worlds-first-trans-clinic/

permalink
report
parent
reply
41 points

They literally said that letting trans people transition and get gender reassignment surgery will “destroy our nation”. Its literally fascist rhetoric. They’re banning changing your gender on documents, something only 3000 people have done since 2016. The country has 143 million people.

This is genocidal rhetoric. This is a transparent attempt to promote conspiracies against trans people intending for average people to think “trans people are going to destroy my society” and “trans people are a threat to families and children”. It’s literal fascist genocidal rhetoric.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

And tankies feel comfortable with that way of thinking. BuT nO, uKrOnAzIs.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

It’s not a godwin if they are literally nazis performing a literal genocide whilst literally losing a war of agression in Europe.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Yeah I think we’re gonna have to pause the godwin thing for a while. Too many people in power running plays right out of the Nazi playbook nowadays. A stigma against comparisons to Nazis isn’t preventing discussions from degenerating to name calling (the original intent of the rule) it’s just preventing conversation from happening.

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
5 points

When in crisis just choose a minority to shit on and the majority will be happier.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

That’s the point they are so few people why care either way

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

Can we add a rule where all articles should be archive articles to avoid incidentally paying a shitty company ad revenue. In this case an organisation that houses and protects child predators.

permalink
report
reply
9 points
*

Sup, you might want to raise that within feedback channels within your instance. Threads like this one are seen by many instances so there’s going to be disagreement in the votes. It’s a perfectly fair thing to do though, years ago we banned direct links to the BBC in the UK left’s largest subreddit /r/greenandpleasant (i mod) for its transphobia.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

God I miss greenandpleasant; it’s really the only thing I miss from Reddit. :(

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
*

Here was being considered as a potential lifeboat although getting people to migrate would be slow and any new community would be small, but the soft on meta position of the instance made a mess of internal thoughts on what to do.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I mean bbc.com is ad-driven; bbc.co.uk isn’t.

bbc.com is the website the majority of people will access though.

permalink
report
parent
reply

World News

!world@lemmy.world

Create post

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

  • Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:

    • Post news articles only
    • Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
    • Title must match the article headline
    • Not United States Internal News
    • Recent (Past 30 Days)
    • Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
  • Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think “Is this fair use?”, it probably isn’t. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.

  • Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.

  • Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.

  • Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19

  • Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

  • Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.

  • Rule 7: We didn’t USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you’re posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

Community stats

  • 12K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 274K

    Comments