12 points

Announce thing, stock price spikes, don’t do thing.

Is that not market manipulation?

permalink
report
reply
-1 points

If you say “I’m going to sell 4 apples!”. Then sell 4 apples. Then immediately buy 5. Did you lie?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

According to the article, I think a more appropriate analogy would be claiming “I’m going to sell four apples!”, followed by actually selling three apples. Then claiming you spent a fortune to get out of an existing contract saying you would rent an apple-basket for x years, as well as having to pay the apples you sold because you sold them earlier than you told them you would. And then buying two apples from the person selling apples next-door that picks their apples from the same tree you picked yours from.

At the end of the day you’ve only lowered your apple count by one while you simultaneously:

  • Manufactured a tax write-off for the expenses you incurred by prematurely selling three apples

  • Manufactured a tax write-off for the expenses you incurred by prematurely terminating the agreement to rent an apple-basket

  • Manufactured a tax write-off for the expenses you incurred by buying two apples from a rival apple merchant

  • Sewed seeds of doubt among all fruits, vegetables, and other produce regarding their chances of finding a merchant

  • Got investors to at least temporarily value your business higher because they thought you had five too many apples and were excited at the prospect of you selling four of them

Keep in mind that in this analogy you had teams of experts that calculated all of this for you well in advance of you even making an announcement, and that the rival apple merchant also took very similar, if not identical steps.

Edit: Oh, and don’t forget that selling apples isn’t actually the business you and your rival apple merchant are in. You’re both actually in the juice business and apples are just a means to an end for you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Lol yes. Accurate. Very google

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Man I’ve gotta get into the apple business

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Lying through omission is a thing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

That’s the secret. It’s all manipulation.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

Sure hate how this article talks about employees wanted raises as being pompous and cocky and then spins it like we should feel bad for tech companies and their need to cut costs. Which is their fault for rapidly expanding without much planning for the future and then “cutting costs” when they realize it’s not sustainable

permalink
report
reply
7 points

I especially love the part where they say that X/Twitter not hiring after their layoffs has left many people wondering what those employees were doing in the first place. As someone who has never been very “into” Twitter, even I can see that the site has gone way downhill since Musk and his layoffs. I don’t have to wonder what the laid off employees were doing because I know by a quick glance that whatever they were doing, they were doing it better than it’s being done now.

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 20K

    Posts

  • 526K

    Comments