And you know who I also don’t condemn?

The IRA

The Viet Minh

John Brown

Haitian slaves who revolted

Native American fighters

Black Panthers

National Liberation Front (Algeria)

Nelson Mandela

The 26th of July Movement

Every one of them were called “terrorists” or something equivalent at some point. Now think about who’s on the opposite of this list. Apartied South Africa, slavers, settlers, Zionists, the US government… There is only one moral and just side to be on and it’s not even a discussion.

114 points

Nelson Mandela is a good historical figure to bring up in this context. Liberals love him for his rehabilitated image as a peace negotiator, but he didn’t go to prison for writing letters to the editor.

permalink
report
reply

They love crowing on about Nelson Mandela in prison but always without a single murmur about what he was unjustly imprisoned for

permalink
report
parent
reply

I exposed one Redditor as a collaborator during the Apartheid in South Africa because I immediately went for the carotid artery with the “historical context”

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

Nelson Mandela was literally considered a terrorist by the US government until 2008

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

If they had any integrity they still would.

permalink
report
parent
reply

They repeatedly offered to release him from jail in exchange for denouncing socialism. He did no such thing. He also reached a point where he refused to condemn violent rebellion because the non-violence wasn’t getting the goods. What liberals unknowingly worship him for, in their civility fetishism, is his acts of public reconciliation with the colonizers. Would have been good to get that post-apartheid wealth redistribution instead but what’s done is done.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

The lesson is, and always will be, to get the goods first.

permalink
report
parent
reply
61 points
*

unarmed Palestinians did peaceful Great March of Return throughout 2018 and were cut down in the thousands by IOF snipers who were having competitions to see how many people they could maim

so done with this historically ignorant moralizing shit about nonviolence from liberals

permalink
report
reply
53 points

peaceful protest? yeah hooray let me march with you haha

UH ERM VIOLENCE? THAT’S NOT THE RIGHT WAY TO GET THINGS DONE !!!1!!!1

all it takes to piss off a liberal is telling them that actual real change doesn’t happen with signing petitions and holding hands. no government gives a single shit or fuck about your lip service and will continue to steamroll oppressed groups regardless

permalink
report
reply

UH ERM VIOLENCE? THAT’S NOT THE RIGHT WAY TO GET THINGS DONE !!!1!!!1

They all just need to vote harder!

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

wooooooow bro come on man dude look are you saying people shouldn’t vote at all? wow bro seriously man damn

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

vote harder

yeah - kinetically.

I kinetically vote to remove fash from my local area

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Because liberals don’t actually care about what happens to oppressed groups they just want to feel morally superior while never being effected by the conditions of the system they support.

permalink
report
parent
reply
44 points

I’d like to hear someone go full cheeky on the “condemn hamas” thing and be all “well actually Hamas had good intelligence that the IDF was embedded with those concertgoers so that was just collateral damage.”

permalink
report
reply
11 points

The IDF was using those concertgoers as human shields.

permalink
report
parent
reply
43 points
*

I hate the framing of Hamas as terrorists, if they are considered terrorists, The IOF should be too.

I was reading the 1988 charter and there are parts of it that are sketchy and contain anti semitic stuff, like saying that Jews control the world and media and that they use groups like the Freemasons to push the Zionist agenda. I think there is one quote about killing jews. But in the same charter they talk about aoming for Muslims, Christians and Jews to live peacefully together as they had after the Islamic conquest in the 7th century. And I recognize that the formation of Hamas is a reaction to colonization, displacement, murder and torture. Also I know they did re-write the charter in 2017 to explicitly state that they are militantly against the Zionist occupation and not Jews. It’s interesting and evokes a lot of different conflicting feelings for me, I just would be super curious to see an interview with someone who has been part of Hamas for decades speak on this

Edit: I’m working on a very brief history of Palestine and I’m finally working on 1988-1995 so there is probably a lot of context I’m missing at this point in the history too and am really curious to keep moving forward and learn about it.

permalink
report
reply
7 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points
*

I guess one problem is that war crimes have a much more concrete definition in public perception than terrorism, so terrorism gets more perceived as a catch all “bad guys” label than a set of tactics.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

The IOF should be too.

Well, they are.

I don’t know if Hamas are the jihadist nationalist fundamentalists they’re painted as, or will they turn out to be modern progressive freedom fighters after the fog of war fades after our generations are gone, but at least the IOF atrocities are known.

Not that the knowledge helps with the indifference of those who could do something smh

permalink
report
parent
reply