The company plans on offering the service to a small group of customers in select areas as part of an early access program.

70 points

I would be more impressed if Google went back to the idea of adding more towns for fiber.

permalink
report
reply
28 points

They’ve been trying, but the existing ISPs have ironclad contracts with most cities they operate in, making it very hard for anybody else to bring competition to those markets.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Our rollout was severely impacted by political interests, but the Australian government tackled this at a national level with building a National Broadband Wholesale network for all the ISP retailers to resell.

It was a lot easier however given how underfunded our existing monopoly telco left the old network.

Unfortunately Rupert Murdoch stated in New York to shareholders that the network would undercut their Australian business, they then used their 67% newspaper market share to back the opposing party and have them downgrade the rollout of the network from fibre to copper.

Now half the country can’t get a full 100mbps and the upload isn’t synchronous for 99% of households.

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

Does Google internet mean they track even more of you than through Chrome?

permalink
report
reply
25 points

When your alternatives are AT&T or Spectrum aka Time Warner Cable, what are you to do? I’ve interacted with Google Fiber customer service maybe once since we got it 6ish years ago…prior to that, I’d be on the phone with Time Warner at one point and then AT&T once per month, because the service would break and we’d need a tech to come fix a connection, or more often they’d Jack up the price with no notice and would only decrease it if you called to complain or threaten to disconnect. Fiber has been the exact same price for 6 years and they prorate a discount if your service happens to go down, which has been rare and brief

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Using the Mozilla VPN on Google Internet is the ultimate power move.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

If Google is the ISP, what’s stopping them from blocking that?

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Nothing is stopping any ISP from blocking any service. This is why net neutrality is important.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Probably but you can use a different dns provider. If you are really concerned, a vpn is the best answer to make sure they don’t get any of your information. The problem is that there aren’t very many VPNs that can do anything close to 10Gbs.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

then the VPN provider knows.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

If they actually don’t keep logs they’d only know at that exact moment. And never again lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Every single isp will use data from their dns servers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Google surely has the best privacy policy of any ISP, assuming they use the public one: https://developers.google.com/speed/public-dns/privacy

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points
*

As someone with symmetrical 1gig and a home server…. Wtf do you do w 20gig?

Also, aren’t you going to need a rack of equipment to even use it?

.

That’s clearly an exaggeration, but 1gig equipment is often actively cooled bc it takes non negligible amounts of compute to route that many packets. I imagine 20gig router is like a small PC

permalink
report
reply
17 points

The cost of the equipment is insane too. It was way too much to upgrade my switch to 2.5 Gbps for local transfers, nevermind any faster speeds.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I know many, many businesses that don’t have 20 or 10 or even 1gig bidirectional internet. This is marketing fluff/flex as they know that even if they offer it to 100% of users. Only a very select few will consume it

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

What kind of non-business user can even use this. Even if we assume all of octomom’s kids have 3 uncompressed 4k bluray streams running each at once - that’s 2.5Gbps max. And no streaming service even offers uncompressed video.

Seriously - what is the point of >1Gbps for normal use? Games? They can be preloaded days in advance nowadays. Even without preloading - it really doesn’t take long to download on a gig connection.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Only a very select few will consume it.

Challenge Accepted.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

You can get used enterprise stuff relatively inexpensive. By relatively, I mean that it is out of most home user budget and expertise, but within the realm of what someone who would want multi-gig could get.

In the datacenter, we stopped using 10G in 2017, and we are working our way up to 200G for servers. Virtual Machine hosts can use all of this bandwidth.

What this means is that you are going to see more 10/25/40G stuff in the used markets. A quick check of eBay and there’s stuff in the $300-$500 range.

In a home situation where you only have a couple of transceivers and single default routing to your ISP, the switch is barely going past idle. Transceivers and doing stuff full table BGP routing is what makes the switch eat power. In home use, I would expect to see under 100W.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Same. And they send me an email every few weeks to see if I’ll upgrade to 2gig. I pretty damn happy with just the 1gig. I can’t imagine what I’d do with 20gig.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I mean… I’m thinking…

Would that be useful for hosting a variety of distributed services? Nah, bc the whole point is horizontal scaling. And 20gig is definitely vertical scaling, but then again, por qué no los dos?

The metaverse (lowercase m) is expected to have lots of need for extremely fast and low latency networking. Even if it’s just short bursts here or there, in a live interactive situation, you definitely want geometries and textures downloading and rendering as fast as you can possibly get them.

So maybe they’re just prepping for that, and trying to get whales to subsidize it all.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Not Dallas though. We’re owned by AT&T and Spectrum. I hate our Internet.

permalink
report
reply
11 points

Isn’t corporate owned infrastructure grand!?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

In my Austin neighborhood, AT&T ran the fiber, and then Google was the ISP that showed up on it. It made me wonder if fiber follows the same ILEC/CLEC relationship that copper did.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
8 points

The problem is I still would hate comcast more than I hate google

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 17K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 555K

    Comments